CAJ | 학술논문

在关于法律本质的认识、比较法学的追求目标和研究方法之间存在着一种内在联系，它们共同构成比较法学的研究范式。后者是学术大气候的产物，带有明显的以非法律学科为导向的色彩。以比较法学研究范式的动态变化为线索，可以发现，在该学科的发展史上始终贯穿着一条清晰的反法条主义进路：首先，概念法学和法律实证主义联手形成的极端形式主义传统成为这条进路的起点；其次，为了谋求专业化和独立学科的地位，比较法学者先后以社会学和人文学科为导向发起两次反法条主义运动。这条进路日益突出了比较法学作为一门理论性学科的维度，而减弱了它作为一门实践性学科的特质，结果造成该学科在理论和实践之间出现分裂。
재관우법률본질적인식、비교법학적추구목표화연구방법지간존재착일충내재련계，타문공동구성비교법학적연구범식。후자시학술대기후적산물，대유명현적이비법률학과위도향적색채。이비교법학연구범식적동태변화위선색，가이발현，재해학과적발전사상시종관천착일조청석적반법조주의진로：수선，개념법학화법률실증주의련수형성적겁단형식주의전통성위저조진로적기점；기차，위료모구전업화화독립학과적지위，비교법학자선후이사회학화인문학과위도향발기량차반법조주의운동。저조진로일익돌출료비교법학작위일문이론성학과적유도，이감약료타작위일문실천성학과적특질，결과조성해학과재이론화실천지간출현분렬。
There is an inherent relationship among the epistemic views concerning the essence of law, the main purposes and methods of comparative legal studies. These factors constitute the research paradigm of the discipline of comparative law, which, as a result of broader academic context, is obviously oriented by non-legal disciplines. Looked from the sequence of the dynamic changes of the research paradigm, there is a clear anti-legalism approach that runs throughout the development of comparative law. First, Begriffsjurisprudenz and Legal Positivism together formed the extreme tendency of legal formalism, which was the starting point of the anti-legalism approach. Second, in order to achieve a high degree of specialization and establish comparative law as an independent discipline, comparatists have launched two anti-legalism movements which were respectively guided by sociology and humanistic disciplines. Under the action of the anti-legalism approach, comparative law transformed incrementally more into a theoretically oriented academic practice, and lost its utilitarian character of being practical knowledge, and resulted in the dichotomous great divide between theory and practice.