重庆大学学报:社会科学版
重慶大學學報:社會科學版
중경대학학보:사회과학판
Journal of Chongqing University(Social Sciences Edition)
2014年
2期
64~72
,共null页
政府工程 非合作博弈 多属性 招投标 博弈
政府工程 非閤作博弈 多屬性 招投標 博弈
정부공정 비합작박혁 다속성 초투표 박혁
government project; non-cooperative game; multi-attribute; bidding; game
一些大型或技术复杂的政府工程确定赢标人时除投标价格因素外,还将质量、工期等因素纳入考虑。为此,文章将政府工程招投标时招标人、竞标人的参与选择过程视为一个要约、承诺和定标的三阶段动态博弈,并构建了政府工程多属性招投标非合作动态博弈模型。然后将投标价格视为竞标质量和工期的函数,求出了投标人的最优竞标战略。通过分析发现投标质量和提前工期分别超过某点后,投标人的收益分别是其投标质量和提前工期的增函数,而在到达该点之前,投标质量和提前工期边际收益递减;招标人的投标承诺质量和提前工期偏好系数越大,竞标人的收益越高,其结果是招标人故意夸大其质量、工期偏好系数,以诱导竞标人投标,增大招标剩余。最后通过算例验证了模型的有效性。
一些大型或技術複雜的政府工程確定贏標人時除投標價格因素外,還將質量、工期等因素納入攷慮。為此,文章將政府工程招投標時招標人、競標人的參與選擇過程視為一箇要約、承諾和定標的三階段動態博弈,併構建瞭政府工程多屬性招投標非閤作動態博弈模型。然後將投標價格視為競標質量和工期的函數,求齣瞭投標人的最優競標戰略。通過分析髮現投標質量和提前工期分彆超過某點後,投標人的收益分彆是其投標質量和提前工期的增函數,而在到達該點之前,投標質量和提前工期邊際收益遞減;招標人的投標承諾質量和提前工期偏好繫數越大,競標人的收益越高,其結果是招標人故意誇大其質量、工期偏好繫數,以誘導競標人投標,增大招標剩餘。最後通過算例驗證瞭模型的有效性。
일사대형혹기술복잡적정부공정학정영표인시제투표개격인소외,환장질량、공기등인소납입고필。위차,문장장정부공정초투표시초표인、경표인적삼여선택과정시위일개요약、승낙화정표적삼계단동태박혁,병구건료정부공정다속성초투표비합작동태박혁모형。연후장투표개격시위경표질량화공기적함수,구출료투표인적최우경표전략。통과분석발현투표질량화제전공기분별초과모점후,투표인적수익분별시기투표질량화제전공기적증함수,이재도체해점지전,투표질량화제전공기변제수익체감;초표인적투표승낙질량화제전공기편호계수월대,경표인적수익월고,기결과시초표인고의과대기질량、공기편호계수,이유도경표인투표,증대초표잉여。최후통과산례험증료모형적유효성。
Determining the winning bidder of some major or technically complex government project is not only the price, bat also the quality and duration etc. So, the paper regards the selection process of government project tenderee and bidder as a three-stage dynamic game of offer, commitment and evaluation, and to build a non-coop- erative and dynamic game model based on multi-attribute government project bidding, and then to consider the price of a function of quality and duration, to find out the optimal bidding strategy of bidder. The analysis turns up that the quality and advanced time respectively after reach one point, the bidder' s earnings are a rise function of quality and advance time, and then the bidder' s earnings would be a decrease function if it before reaches the point. The bidder' s earnings would be much more if the preferences coefficient is much greater of quality and ad- vance time by which tenderee promises, so to gain more bidding surplus, the tenderee would exaggerate the preferences coefficient of quality and advance times. At last, this paper verifies the validity of the model by using exampies.