CAJ | 학술논문

“担保物权绝对优先”和“普通债权平等受偿”一直是中国民事债权清偿顺位所遵循的两大规则。但该种规则因未考虑到意定之债与法定之债的区别而忽略了对人身侵权之债中债权人的保护。尤其是在大规模侵权的情势下，如果严格遵循上述债权清偿规则，势必导致《侵权责任法》和《破产法》之间的冲突，造成民商事法律体系的内在不和谐。因此，有必要通过司法解释的形式赋予人身侵权之债在破产债权中等同于劳动债权的清偿顺位。
“담보물권절대우선”화“보통채권평등수상”일직시중국민사채권청상순위소준순적량대규칙。단해충규칙인미고필도의정지채여법정지채적구별이홀략료대인신침권지채중채권인적보호。우기시재대규모침권적정세하，여과엄격준순상술채권청상규칙，세필도치《침권책임법》화《파산법》지간적충돌，조성민상사법률체계적내재불화해。인차，유필요통과사법해석적형식부여인신침권지채재파산채권중등동우노동채권적청상순위。
The principles of ＂claims secured with property being prior＂ and ＂the common claims being equally repaid＂ have always been followed when deciding the repaying sequence of civil claims. But these two principles are not sufficient for the protection of creditors who are personally injured because the distinctions between agreed debts and legitimate debts have been overlooked. Under the circumstances of mass torts, strictly following the above- mentioned principles will certainly lead to the conflicts between tort law and bankruptcy law, thus cause interior disharmony within the system of civil and business law. Therefore, the claims arising from mass torts upon persons shall be treated equally as laborer＇ s claims through judicial interpretations.