CAJ | 학술논문

专利侵权诉讼中，一般情况下，法院都会判决停止侵权。但由于专利产品的特殊性，有时停止侵权的判决会对公共利益和他人利益造成严重损害。在司法实践中，已经出现了专利侵权诉讼中认定侵权后不判决停止侵权的判例；从知识产权法理和法经济学的角度来看，不判决停止侵权具有合理性，并可通过法律规定进行相应的补偿和救济。
전리침권소송중，일반정황하，법원도회판결정지침권。단유우전리산품적특수성，유시정지침권적판결회대공공이익화타인이익조성엄중손해。재사법실천중，이경출현료전리침권소송중인정침권후불판결정지침권적판례；종지식산권법리화법경제학적각도래간，불판결정지침권구유합이성，병가통과법률규정진행상응적보상화구제。
In patent infringement lawsuit, cessations of infringement are always supported in general situation. However, because of the particular characteristic of patent product, sometimes cessation of in- fringement will cause serious damage to the public or others~ interest. In judicial practice, after patent in- fringement had been confirmed, some cases that cessation of infringement is not supported have emerged. In the view of the aspect of intellectual property law principles and law economy, it is rational not to sup- port to cessation of infringement, with a legally reasonable compensation instead.