金融研究
金融研究
금융연구
Journal of Financial Research
2014年
3期
138~151
,共null页
白云霞 严梦莹 钟宁桦
白雲霞 嚴夢瑩 鐘寧樺
백운하 엄몽형 종저화
保荐项目风险 保荐代表人变更 保荐制度有效性
保薦項目風險 保薦代錶人變更 保薦製度有效性
보천항목풍험 보천대표인변경 보천제도유효성
Project risk, Change of sponsor representatives, Effectiveness of sponsor system
为了提高资金的配置和使用效率,我国证券发审制度由“通道制”变为“保荐制”。“保荐制”规定保荐机构和保荐代表人共同督导上市公司,以保证其质量。但是,保荐代表人在持续督导期内的频繁变更却降低了制度的有效性。通过对保荐制度的剖析,本文发现我国保荐制度中的漏洞使得保荐代表人在面临高风险项目时能够通过变更来规避处罚。为了验证,本文以2006—2009年定向增发上市公司为样本,考察了保荐代表人变更的原因及市场反应。结果显示,当保荐项目风险越大、定增前盈余管理程度越高、保荐机构级别越低时,保荐代表人越容易变更。此外,本文发现市场对保荐代表人的变更反应消极,这很可能是因为变更向市场传递了项目质量差的负面信号。
為瞭提高資金的配置和使用效率,我國證券髮審製度由“通道製”變為“保薦製”。“保薦製”規定保薦機構和保薦代錶人共同督導上市公司,以保證其質量。但是,保薦代錶人在持續督導期內的頻繁變更卻降低瞭製度的有效性。通過對保薦製度的剖析,本文髮現我國保薦製度中的漏洞使得保薦代錶人在麵臨高風險項目時能夠通過變更來規避處罰。為瞭驗證,本文以2006—2009年定嚮增髮上市公司為樣本,攷察瞭保薦代錶人變更的原因及市場反應。結果顯示,噹保薦項目風險越大、定增前盈餘管理程度越高、保薦機構級彆越低時,保薦代錶人越容易變更。此外,本文髮現市場對保薦代錶人的變更反應消極,這很可能是因為變更嚮市場傳遞瞭項目質量差的負麵信號。
위료제고자금적배치화사용효솔,아국증권발심제도유“통도제”변위“보천제”。“보천제”규정보천궤구화보천대표인공동독도상시공사,이보증기질량。단시,보천대표인재지속독도기내적빈번변경각강저료제도적유효성。통과대보천제도적부석,본문발현아국보천제도중적루동사득보천대표인재면림고풍험항목시능구통과변경래규피처벌。위료험증,본문이2006—2009년정향증발상시공사위양본,고찰료보천대표인변경적원인급시장반응。결과현시,당보천항목풍험월대、정증전영여관리정도월고、보천궤구급별월저시,보천대표인월용역변경。차외,본문발현시장대보천대표인적변경반응소겁,저흔가능시인위변경향시장전체료항목질량차적부면신호。
Sponsor system is the ongoing securities offering system that China uses. Sponsors play a crucial role in improving the efficiency of capital allocation of the securities market, since they are in charge of both recom- mending a company ( or a project) for securities offering and monitoring the projects post to the issuance. How- ever, the effectiveness of the sponsor system is compromised by the fact that sponsors representatives frequently leave their jobs before their works have been finished. This study examines the reasons for the turnover and the market reactions to such turnover. Our research sample consists of companies that make private placement of equity from 2006 to 2009. Our findings show that turnover among sponsor representatives increases when a) project risk is higher, b) earnings management is higher and c) institutional sponsor grade is lower. It is sur- mised that sponsor representatives leave their roles to avoid being punished. In addition, market reaction is typ- ically negative when sponsor representatives leave. This means the turnover delivers a negative signal about the projects to market.