经济管理
經濟管理
경제관리
Economic Management Journal(EMJ)
2014年
4期
148~159
,共null页
社会资本 技术创新 探索式学习 利用式学习
社會資本 技術創新 探索式學習 利用式學習
사회자본 기술창신 탐색식학습 이용식학습
social capital ; innovation ; exploratory learning; exploitative learning
本文将社会资本、组织学习和技术创新纳入到统一框架中,构建结构性社会资本对技术创新作用机制的概念模型,并且通过对101家高新技术企业的问卷调查,阐述并验证利用式学习和探索式学习在结构性社会资本和技术创新问的中介作用。研究表明:(1)不同类型的结构性社会资本对不同的组织学习方式产生不同的影响,不同类型的结构性社会资本对不同类型的技术创新的影响也不相同。频繁的社会互动、高度网络中心性和行业内部联系有利于利用式学习,也有利于渐进式创新;较低的社会互动、高度网络中心性和行业外部联系有利于探索式学习,也有利于激进式创新;(2)利用式学习与渐进式创新正相关,探索式学习与激进式创新正相关;(3)利用式学习和探索式学习分别在结构性社会资本对渐进式创新和激进式创新的影响机制中发挥中介作用。
本文將社會資本、組織學習和技術創新納入到統一框架中,構建結構性社會資本對技術創新作用機製的概唸模型,併且通過對101傢高新技術企業的問捲調查,闡述併驗證利用式學習和探索式學習在結構性社會資本和技術創新問的中介作用。研究錶明:(1)不同類型的結構性社會資本對不同的組織學習方式產生不同的影響,不同類型的結構性社會資本對不同類型的技術創新的影響也不相同。頻繁的社會互動、高度網絡中心性和行業內部聯繫有利于利用式學習,也有利于漸進式創新;較低的社會互動、高度網絡中心性和行業外部聯繫有利于探索式學習,也有利于激進式創新;(2)利用式學習與漸進式創新正相關,探索式學習與激進式創新正相關;(3)利用式學習和探索式學習分彆在結構性社會資本對漸進式創新和激進式創新的影響機製中髮揮中介作用。
본문장사회자본、조직학습화기술창신납입도통일광가중,구건결구성사회자본대기술창신작용궤제적개념모형,병차통과대101가고신기술기업적문권조사,천술병험증이용식학습화탐색식학습재결구성사회자본화기술창신문적중개작용。연구표명:(1)불동류형적결구성사회자본대불동적조직학습방식산생불동적영향,불동류형적결구성사회자본대불동류형적기술창신적영향야불상동。빈번적사회호동、고도망락중심성화행업내부련계유리우이용식학습,야유리우점진식창신;교저적사회호동、고도망락중심성화행업외부련계유리우탐색식학습,야유리우격진식창신;(2)이용식학습여점진식창신정상관,탐색식학습여격진식창신정상관;(3)이용식학습화탐색식학습분별재결구성사회자본대점진식창신화격진식창신적영향궤제중발휘중개작용。
Technological innovation is considered a critical determinant of firm performance and survival. For high-technology ventures in emerging countries such as China, successful innovation is of paramount importance, relying on not the ability of single firm to generate and develop creative ideas, but the ability of acquiring and in- tegrating external resources. Social capital, which places significant emphasis on the role of external relationships, is defined as "the sum of actual and potential resources embedded within, available through, and derived from the network of relationship possessed by an individual or social unit". Recent advances in understanding technological innovation have been informed by social capital theory. Accommodating the market trend, research on the combination and relationship between social capital and technological innovation connects business strategy theory with technological innovation theory. Technological inno- vation and social capital request enterprise to strengthen knowledge stock by some new ways such as sharing in knowledge assets, cooperating with external partner and so on. The exploitation and exploration in knowledge stock promotes technological innovation performance and strengthens enterprise' s competitive advantages in market. Exploratory learning and exploitative learning are critical to stimulate the latent capacity effectively and en- hance the knowledge stock that enterprise' s technological innovation depends on. And creative knowledge acquired by exploratory learning and exploitative learning is gradually critical source for enterprise to generate new knowledge and new products or services. Moreover, it is impossible to acquire, utilize and integrate new knowledge isolated from external environment. Accordingly, it is necessary for us to examine the relationship between structural social capital and technological innovation in the context of exploratory learning and exploitative learning, in order not to extend the application of social capital, but also to deeply recognize the channels by which corporate stimulates in- novation. This paper puts three fields of social capital, organizational learning and technological innovation into a unified framework. We review and build a conceptual framework of the impact of differential effects of social ties, network centrality, intra-industry managerial ties and extra-industry managerial ties of structural social capital on exploratory and exploitative learning and subsequently exploratory and exploitative learning on different types of technological innovation. In this work, the questionnaire is used to collect data. The research drew on a convenient sample of 264 high technology ventures. Totally, the research obtained data from 101 firms, for a valid participation rate of 38.2%. Using statistic, analysis software such as SPSS and AMOS,the data is computed and analyzed. And some methods such as correlation analysis, main component factor analysis, multiple linear regression and structural equation rood Ii~g(SEM) were used to verify all the hypothesis deduced from the conceptual model empirically. And some itm;J~, i i~g arid important conclusions are as follows: (1)Different types of structural social capital have a distinctive impacl on two paradigms of organizational learning, and also have a distinctive impact on two paradigms of techno- logical innovation. That is, structural social capital characterizing more social ties among actors of network, higher network centrality and more intra-industry managerial ties not only has a positive effect on exploitative learning sig- nificantly, but also promotes incremental innovation. Meanwhile, structural social capital characterizing less social ties among actors of network, higher network centrality and more extra-industry managerial ties has a positive effect on exploratory learning significantly, but also promotes radical innovation. (2)Exploratory learning has a positive impact on radical innovation, while exploitative learning has a positive impact on incremental innovation. (3)The results also support the argument that exploratory learning intermediately shapes the relationship between structural social capital and radical innovation, and exploitative learning plays a intermediate role in the relationship between structural social capital and incremental innovation. This research makes some contribution to the fields of social capital, organizational learning and technological innovation. The findings draw attention of managers from high technological firms operating in China to the impor- tant rote of structural social capital in enhancing learning and innovation performance.