CAJ | 학술논문

本研究的目的在于比较生活满意度、政府满意度、社会风险判断等社会预警指标的网络调查和传统调查的等价性。通过197个大学生间隔一周对社会预警指标进行两次评价，一次是传统的纸笔测试，一次是网络测试。结果表明，生活满意度的线上（4．28）高于线下（4．10）；而自我状态、政府满意度、社会风险判断和集群意向的线上和线下没有差异。这说明有的社会预警指标如集群意向的纸笔测试和网络测试的结果相同，有的社会预警指标如生活满意度的纸笔测试和网络测试的结果差异比较大。用网络测试来替代传统的纸笔测试，需要在社会预警指标的选择上做更好地控制和校正。
본연구적목적재우비교생활만의도、정부만의도、사회풍험판단등사회예경지표적망락조사화전통조사적등개성。통과197개대학생간격일주대사회예경지표진행량차평개，일차시전통적지필측시，일차시망락측시。결과표명，생활만의도적선상（4．28）고우선하（4．10）；이자아상태、정부만의도、사회풍험판단화집군의향적선상화선하몰유차이。저설명유적사회예경지표여집군의향적지필측시화망락측시적결과상동，유적사회예경지표여생활만의도적지필측시화망락측시적결과차이비교대。용망락측시래체대전통적지필측시，수요재사회예경지표적선택상주경호지공제화교정。
This paper examines the measurement invariance of social monitoring indicators between a paper-and-pencil survey and a web-based survey which includes life satisfaction and government satisfaction, collective intentionality, social risk factors, etc. It gives both a paper-and-pencil survey and a web-based survey per week to 197 undergraduates concerning five social monitoring indicators. The results show that their life satisfaction is higher in the web-based（4. 28） than the paper-and-pencil（4. 10） and that other four indicators have no significant difference. It helps deepen our understanding of measurement invariance of social monitoring indicators and reveals that some indicators such as collective intentionality are almost the same in the two surveys while other indicators like life satisfaction show much variation on different conditions. Thus, there should be some adjustment of the social monitoring indicators when the web-based survey is used to replace the traditional one.