CAJ | 학술논문

协调专属经济区内“航行自由”规则的解释、适用、遵守与外国军事活动之间的关系,是维护国际海洋秩序的主要议题.根据专属经济区内“航行自由”是否包括从事军事活动权利为标准,本文将各种立场划分为“包容性解释”和“非包容性解释”,并根据国家海军力量大小,将理想的博弈分为弱国—弱国、强国—强国、强国—弱国三种类型,博弈结果就是在两种立场之间做出占优的策略选择.分析结论表明,如果对中国有重要战略价值的周边国家都持“非包容性解释”立场,则中国的收益偏低;若中国和其他相关国家都持“包容性解释”立场,除了中美博弈过程中中国收益为负外,其他情况下总体收益为正.因此,倡导和维护一种以“包容性解释”立场为核心的海洋法律秩序符合中国国家利益.
협조전속경제구내“항행자유”규칙적해석、괄용、준수여외국군사활동지간적관계,시유호국제해양질서적주요의제.근거전속경제구내“항행자유”시부포괄종사군사활동권리위표준,본문장각충립장화분위“포용성해석”화“비포용성해석”,병근거국가해군역량대소,장이상적박혁분위약국—약국、강국—강국、강국—약국삼충류형,박혁결과취시재량충립장지간주출점우적책략선택.분석결론표명,여과대중국유중요전략개치적주변국가도지“비포용성해석”립장,칙중국적수익편저;약중국화기타상관국가도지“포용성해석”립장,제료중미박혁과정중중국수익위부외,기타정황하총체수익위정.인차,창도화유호일충이“포용성해석”립장위핵심적해양법률질서부합중국국가이익.
The main issue of maintaining the international order for the sea consists in how to define the re- lations between interpretation, application and compliance of ＂freedom of navigation＂ in EEZ and military activities of foreign states. According to whether ＂freedom of navigation＂ in EEZ includes the right of mili- tary activities, this paper divides the various positions into ＂Inclusive Interpretation＂ and ＂Exclusive Inter- pretation＂, and states concerned may be classified as strong state and weak state, thus the ideal types of game are between the strong state vs. strong state, strong state vs. weak state and weak state vs. weak state. The analysis shows that, payoff for China is relatively low when relevant states around China adopt ＂Exclusive Interpretation＂ ; When all states, including China, adopt ＂Inclusive Interpretation＂, the payoff is negative in the game between China and United States, but the overall payoff is positive considering games with states other than United States. It may be drawn that it is consistent with China national inter- ests if China advocate and vindicate an order of the sea compatible with ＂Inclusive Interpretation＂.