华侨大学学报:哲学社会科学版
華僑大學學報:哲學社會科學版
화교대학학보:철학사회과학판
Journal of Huaqiao University(Humanities & Social Science)
2014年
1期
97~102
,共null页
信访制度 纠纷解决机制 法经济学
信訪製度 糾紛解決機製 法經濟學
신방제도 규분해결궤제 법경제학
letters and calls system; disputes resolution; law and economics
信访作为一种公共产品,属于缺乏消费弹性的刚性产品.信访的免费性激励当事人进行信访,但作为信访消费者的纠纷当事人,往往会沉溺于纠纷解决“沉没成本”的心理效应,而导致对于穷尽一切纠纷解决方式的信访兜底路径依赖,从而扩大了对信访公共产品的需求.作为信访产品提供者的国家,虽可以通过信访机制获得对代理人地方治理的绩效考评,改善中央对地方的治理委托过程中的信息不对称.不过,这种改善的前提在于需要配套足够的上级信访受案容量,以免造成信访者为获得信访纠纷解决而产生的过频过度放大纠纷强度的逆向激励.但是,这种前提却存在着逻辑悖论,即为了满足信访的供应量而实现的放量信访纠纷解决公共产品供应,只会分流其他正式的纠纷解决机制,并反过来加剧信访本身的拥堵,进而使得信访制度这一公共产品劣质化.
信訪作為一種公共產品,屬于缺乏消費彈性的剛性產品.信訪的免費性激勵噹事人進行信訪,但作為信訪消費者的糾紛噹事人,往往會沉溺于糾紛解決“沉沒成本”的心理效應,而導緻對于窮儘一切糾紛解決方式的信訪兜底路徑依賴,從而擴大瞭對信訪公共產品的需求.作為信訪產品提供者的國傢,雖可以通過信訪機製穫得對代理人地方治理的績效攷評,改善中央對地方的治理委託過程中的信息不對稱.不過,這種改善的前提在于需要配套足夠的上級信訪受案容量,以免造成信訪者為穫得信訪糾紛解決而產生的過頻過度放大糾紛彊度的逆嚮激勵.但是,這種前提卻存在著邏輯悖論,即為瞭滿足信訪的供應量而實現的放量信訪糾紛解決公共產品供應,隻會分流其他正式的糾紛解決機製,併反過來加劇信訪本身的擁堵,進而使得信訪製度這一公共產品劣質化.
신방작위일충공공산품,속우결핍소비탄성적강성산품.신방적면비성격려당사인진행신방,단작위신방소비자적규분당사인,왕왕회침닉우규분해결“침몰성본”적심리효응,이도치대우궁진일절규분해결방식적신방두저로경의뢰,종이확대료대신방공공산품적수구.작위신방산품제공자적국가,수가이통과신방궤제획득대대리인지방치리적적효고평,개선중앙대지방적치리위탁과정중적신식불대칭.불과,저충개선적전제재우수요배투족구적상급신방수안용량,이면조성신방자위획득신방규분해결이산생적과빈과도방대규분강도적역향격려.단시,저충전제각존재착라집패론,즉위료만족신방적공응량이실현적방량신방규분해결공공산품공응,지회분류기타정식적규분해결궤제,병반과래가극신방본신적옹도,진이사득신방제도저일공공산품렬질화.
Letters and calls (Petition) as a kind of public good, is lack of flexibility for consuming. Free petition that in- cites disputers conducting petition will expand the demand of public petition service supplement, therefore they follow the path dependence of exhaustive remedies due to "sunk cost" psychological effect. As a petition service provider, national system will conduct its local bureaucratic agent's performance evaluation and improve the asymmetric information between the central and local governance. However, this improvement applies adequate supplement petition services, so as to avoid petitioners increase their petition request for the petition filing. The cost-income formula shows the following petition para- dox: Petitioners have to suffer a decision to increase more request for more possibility of petition filing while to encourage more disputers to apply more petitions. When the petition servicers increase more supplement for better disputes resolution will shunt other formal remedies in turn exacerbate the pressure of petition services.