经济研究
經濟研究
경제연구
Economic Research Journal
2014年
4期
104~115
,共null页
外资准入壁垒 上海自由贸易区 外商直接投资 关税政策 负面清单
外資準入壁壘 上海自由貿易區 外商直接投資 關稅政策 負麵清單
외자준입벽루 상해자유무역구 외상직접투자 관세정책 부면청단
Entry Barriers ; China(Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone ; FDI ; Tariff Policy ; Negative List
中国的《指导外商投资方向规定》和《外商投资产业指导目录》等行政审批制度对外资企业的FDI作出了严格规制。中共十八届三中全会提出要改革上述外资准入壁垒制度,并且随着上海自由贸易试验区的诞生,相关的体制改革已然开始。那么,具有国情特色的外资准入壁垒政策的主要效应是什么,而新一轮体制改革又可能获得什么成效?本文基于新贸易理论构建了一个动态博弈模型进行理论研究。结果表明:(1)设置一定程度的外资准入壁垒,是以社会福利最大化为目标的发展中国家政府的理性选择。(2)放松外资准入壁垒,建立并推广自由贸易区,可能会带来“(企业向消费者的)转移支付”、“扩大内需”、“价格平抑”以及“国产化”等积极的政策效应。(3)上海自由贸易区以“负面清单”模式保留少部分产业的准入规制措施,这种渐进改革具有较强的合理性。改革外资准入壁垒制度,应该可以带来积极的政策红利。
中國的《指導外商投資方嚮規定》和《外商投資產業指導目錄》等行政審批製度對外資企業的FDI作齣瞭嚴格規製。中共十八屆三中全會提齣要改革上述外資準入壁壘製度,併且隨著上海自由貿易試驗區的誕生,相關的體製改革已然開始。那麽,具有國情特色的外資準入壁壘政策的主要效應是什麽,而新一輪體製改革又可能穫得什麽成效?本文基于新貿易理論構建瞭一箇動態博弈模型進行理論研究。結果錶明:(1)設置一定程度的外資準入壁壘,是以社會福利最大化為目標的髮展中國傢政府的理性選擇。(2)放鬆外資準入壁壘,建立併推廣自由貿易區,可能會帶來“(企業嚮消費者的)轉移支付”、“擴大內需”、“價格平抑”以及“國產化”等積極的政策效應。(3)上海自由貿易區以“負麵清單”模式保留少部分產業的準入規製措施,這種漸進改革具有較彊的閤理性。改革外資準入壁壘製度,應該可以帶來積極的政策紅利。
중국적《지도외상투자방향규정》화《외상투자산업지도목록》등행정심비제도대외자기업적FDI작출료엄격규제。중공십팔계삼중전회제출요개혁상술외자준입벽루제도,병차수착상해자유무역시험구적탄생,상관적체제개혁이연개시。나요,구유국정특색적외자준입벽루정책적주요효응시십요,이신일륜체제개혁우가능획득십요성효?본문기우신무역이론구건료일개동태박혁모형진행이론연구。결과표명:(1)설치일정정도적외자준입벽루,시이사회복리최대화위목표적발전중국가정부적이성선택。(2)방송외자준입벽루,건립병추엄자유무역구,가능회대래“(기업향소비자적)전이지부”、“확대내수”、“개격평억”이급“국산화”등적겁적정책효응。(3)상해자유무역구이“부면청단”모식보류소부분산업적준입규제조시,저충점진개혁구유교강적합이성。개혁외자준입벽루제도,응해가이대래적겁적정책홍리。
In the last decades, laws about entry barriers to the FDI and multinational corporations have been set up in China, such as " Regulations on Foreign Investment Direction" and " Catalogue for the Guidance of Foreign Investment Industries". In 2013, the Third Plenary Session of the 18th CCP proposed to reform above system, and the related reforms are beginning with the birth of the China(Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade. What are the main effects of entry barriers to foreign investment in China? What may be obtained in the next series of reforms? To solve these questions, this paper does a theoretical research through building a dynamic game model by the new trade theory. The results show that: 1 ) Setting up entry barriers to foreign investment is a rational choice of developing country's government for maximizing social welfare; 2) Deregulation of entry barriers such as establishing free trade zone can bring a series of positive economic performance, such as transfer payments which are transferred from corporation to consumers ,expanding domestic demand, price suppression and expanding output of the domestic products; 3 ) China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone conducts a "negative list" to retain a small part of entry barriers in the free trade zone, such progressive reform is strong rationality. In brief, the reforms of entry barriers to foreign investment may bring positive policy effects.