广西师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版
廣西師範大學學報:哲學社會科學版
엄서사범대학학보:철학사회과학판
Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosphy and Social Science Edition)
2014年
1期
56~62
,共null页
祖业观 祖业权 地权纠纷 准私有制
祖業觀 祖業權 地權糾紛 準私有製
조업관 조업권 지권규분 준사유제
concept of ancestral property; ancestral property rights; land rights disputes; quasi private ownership
土地制度在国家行政力量的推动下而不断变革,但当前农村社会依然有着较为稳固的关于土地是“祖业”的观念.“祖业权”因具有较为完整的使用权却不具备独立产权的完整性,而明显区别于建立在西方市民社会基础上的私有产权.因此,祖业权是一种“准私有制”产权形式.土地纠纷是近几十年来农村社会的主要纠纷类型,而祖业权在宗族社会的运转直接引发新的地权冲突.祖业权的地方实践蕴含着政府政治世界和农民生活世界、大传统和小传统等两套话语逻辑的博弈和冲突,并且在博弈过程中,后者往往占据上风.这样,祖业权的乡土实践就成为国家法在乡土社会中遭遇系列困境的根源所在.因此,国家政策的实施要认真对待祖业权等地方性知识.
土地製度在國傢行政力量的推動下而不斷變革,但噹前農村社會依然有著較為穩固的關于土地是“祖業”的觀唸.“祖業權”因具有較為完整的使用權卻不具備獨立產權的完整性,而明顯區彆于建立在西方市民社會基礎上的私有產權.因此,祖業權是一種“準私有製”產權形式.土地糾紛是近幾十年來農村社會的主要糾紛類型,而祖業權在宗族社會的運轉直接引髮新的地權遲突.祖業權的地方實踐蘊含著政府政治世界和農民生活世界、大傳統和小傳統等兩套話語邏輯的博弈和遲突,併且在博弈過程中,後者往往佔據上風.這樣,祖業權的鄉土實踐就成為國傢法在鄉土社會中遭遇繫列睏境的根源所在.因此,國傢政策的實施要認真對待祖業權等地方性知識.
토지제도재국가행정역량적추동하이불단변혁,단당전농촌사회의연유착교위은고적관우토지시“조업”적관념.“조업권”인구유교위완정적사용권각불구비독립산권적완정성,이명현구별우건립재서방시민사회기출상적사유산권.인차,조업권시일충“준사유제”산권형식.토지규분시근궤십년래농촌사회적주요규분류형,이조업권재종족사회적운전직접인발신적지권충돌.조업권적지방실천온함착정부정치세계화농민생활세계、대전통화소전통등량투화어라집적박혁화충돌,병차재박혁과정중,후자왕왕점거상풍.저양,조업권적향토실천취성위국가법재향토사회중조우계렬곤경적근원소재.인차,국가정책적실시요인진대대조업권등지방성지식.
Driven by the State administrative power, land system has been reformed constantly. However, rural society at present still holds a solid concept of taking land as ancestral property rights. Ancestral property rights are apparently different from private property rights based on Western citizens ' society, because the former has a rather complete use of right yet not an intact independent property. In this sense, ancestral property right is a form of quasi-private ownership. Land disputes are the main types of disputes in rural society in recent decades. The operation of ancestral rights in lineage society directly triggers off new disputes about land rights. Local practices of ancestral property rights contain gaming and conflicting between two discourse logics, for example, government's political world and farmers' living world, big tradition and small tradition, etc. And in the gaming process the latter always takes the upper hand. In this case, local practices of ancestral property rights have become the root of difficulties when constitutional law is operated in rural society. Therefore, local knowledge such as that of ancestral property rights should be taken seriously in the implementation of state policies.