法律科学:西北政法学院学报
法律科學:西北政法學院學報
법률과학:서북정법학원학보
Science of Law
2014年
2期
106~114
,共null页
占有 取得与丧失 事实行为 目的意思 规范分析
佔有 取得與喪失 事實行為 目的意思 規範分析
점유 취득여상실 사실행위 목적의사 규범분석
possession; acquisition and relinquishment; factual act; intent meaning; normative analysis
占有行为是指占有的取得或丧失行为,它既不同于遗失等可归于自然事实的占有取得或丧失,也不同于埋藏物发现等形式上有占有要素、但该要素并无实质效用的形似行为,还不同于善意占有变为恶意占有等占有变更。占有行为包括了取得占有或丧失占有的目的意思,该意思不能独立于取得或丧失对物支配的事实状态,故占有行为是目的意思不独立的事实行为。尽管占有行为与法律行为相当不同,但它们之间存有协力、制约、衔接、并存等紧密的规范关联。在法律效果归属领域,在适用占有辅助规范和间接占有规范的基础上,还应类推适用代理规范。
佔有行為是指佔有的取得或喪失行為,它既不同于遺失等可歸于自然事實的佔有取得或喪失,也不同于埋藏物髮現等形式上有佔有要素、但該要素併無實質效用的形似行為,還不同于善意佔有變為噁意佔有等佔有變更。佔有行為包括瞭取得佔有或喪失佔有的目的意思,該意思不能獨立于取得或喪失對物支配的事實狀態,故佔有行為是目的意思不獨立的事實行為。儘管佔有行為與法律行為相噹不同,但它們之間存有協力、製約、銜接、併存等緊密的規範關聯。在法律效果歸屬領域,在適用佔有輔助規範和間接佔有規範的基礎上,還應類推適用代理規範。
점유행위시지점유적취득혹상실행위,타기불동우유실등가귀우자연사실적점유취득혹상실,야불동우매장물발현등형식상유점유요소、단해요소병무실질효용적형사행위,환불동우선의점유변위악의점유등점유변경。점유행위포괄료취득점유혹상실점유적목적의사,해의사불능독립우취득혹상실대물지배적사실상태,고점유행위시목적의사불독립적사실행위。진관점유행위여법률행위상당불동,단타문지간존유협력、제약、함접、병존등긴밀적규범관련。재법률효과귀속영역,재괄용점유보조규범화간접점유규범적기출상,환응유추괄용대리규범。
As the shortened form of the action of acquisition and relinquishment of possession, the action of possession is different from the acquisition and relinquishment of possession which should be ascribed to natural fact, and missing something is the representative for such natural fact. Moreover, the action of possession is not same as the kind of action which includes useless possession factor; for instance, unearthing. In addition, the change of possession such as the con- version from goodwill possession to malice possession is not the action of possession. Because the intent meaning of acquisi- tion or relinquishment of possession does not depend on the fact to dominating the thing or losing control of the thing, the action of possession belongs to the factual act with dependent intent meaning. Though the action of possession is distinguish-ed from juristic action, these two have close relationship such as cooperation, restriction, connection, coexistence, etc. In the field of adscription of legal effect, the rules of possession assistance and indirect possession should be applied, and the rule of agent should be referred to.