CAJ | 학술논문

日本学者望月清司在其代表作《马克思历史理论的研究》中，从广松涉的“分担论”出发，提出在《德意志意识形态》中存在着马克思的“分工展开史论”同恩格斯的“所有形态史论”之间的对立。我们认为，这种说法是建立在对《德意志意识形态》文本的曲解上的，是完全站不住脚的。实际上，从“分工展开”对历史的论述，恰恰是为了揭示“所有形态”的历史演变；用泛化的“分工”范畴说明一系列重大社会现象的本质和根源，只是基于进一步解释“生产力决定交往形式”、“市民社会决定国家和法、意识形态”之根本规律的具体实现机制的需要。因此，“泛分工论”不过是马克思恩格斯在“经济学知识不足”的情况下阐释唯物史观基本原理时的一种最初表述方式。望月清司对《德意志意识形态》的曲解，归根结底是为了将马克思的历史理论矮化为市民社会的经验描述，把马克思改塑成“斯密＋韦伯”，把科学的社会主义偷换为自由主义。
일본학자망월청사재기대표작《마극사역사이론적연구》중，종엄송섭적“분담론”출발，제출재《덕의지의식형태》중존재착마극사적“분공전개사론”동은격사적“소유형태사론”지간적대립。아문인위，저충설법시건립재대《덕의지의식형태》문본적곡해상적，시완전참불주각적。실제상，종“분공전개”대역사적논술，흡흡시위료게시“소유형태”적역사연변；용범화적“분공”범주설명일계렬중대사회현상적본질화근원，지시기우진일보해석“생산력결정교왕형식”、“시민사회결정국가화법、의식형태”지근본규률적구체실현궤제적수요。인차，“범분공론”불과시마극사은격사재“경제학지식불족”적정황하천석유물사관기본원리시적일충최초표술방식。망월청사대《덕의지의식형태》적곡해，귀근결저시위료장마극사적역사이론왜화위시민사회적경험묘술，파마극사개소성“사밀＋위백”，파과학적사회주의투환위자유주의。
In his The Study on the Historical Theory of Marx, Seiji Mochizuki proposed there is an opposition between Marx＇ s ＂history theory of labor division＂ and Engels＇＂history theory of Ownership＂, which based on the two division theory in The German Ideology. In my opinion, it is misinterpretation of the text. In fact, the purpose of discussing history in way of labor division is to reveal the history of Ownership evolution. It is in need of further explanation of the specific imple- mentation mechanism in fundamental law, such as ＂Productivity deciding the formation of contacts＂, ＂civil society determining nation, law and ideology＂, that explaining the nature and causes of a se- ries of major social phenomena with the generalization of ＂division of labor＂. Therefore, generalizing division theory is the initially expression of historical materialism when Marx and Engels lack knowl- edge of economics. It is also because of this, Marx abandoned it in the process of political economy criticism. And it was replaced by the more mature domain the personification of the relationship between subject and object conditions of production. Seiji Mochizuki＇ s misinterpretation of The Ger- man Ideology, is ultimately dwarfing Marx＇ s Historical Materialism as civil society described, shaped Marx as Smith ＆ Weber, changed scientific socialism as liberalism.