金融监管研究
金融鑑管研究
금융감관연구
FINANCIAL REGULATION
2014年
4期
32~56
,共null页
行为经济学 行为偏差 金融消费者保护 金融消费者教育
行為經濟學 行為偏差 金融消費者保護 金融消費者教育
행위경제학 행위편차 금융소비자보호 금융소비자교육
Behavioral Economics; Behavioral Biases; Financial Consumer Protection; Financial ConsumerEducation
新古典经济学的严密体系有5个重要的基础性假设:完全理性、完全信息、效用最大化、偏好一致性以及自利性。行为经济学对这些假设提出了挑战,指出:消费者具有系统性、可预测的行为偏差,新古典经济学的5个假设与现实不符;金融机构会利用消费者的行为偏差谋利,导致竞争非有效。对此,行为经济学提出,要在传统纠正市场失灵方法的基础上,从更深层面上纠正消费者行为偏差,需要结合具体的偏差类型,采取自由放任、政府干预、市场化取向的政府柔性干预等方式;同时,为更好地保护消费者权益,需要对金融机构进行行为干预和产品干预,提高信息披露的有效性,推进金融知识普及和金融消费者能力的建设。行为经济学动摇不了新古典经济学的统治地位,但其挑战是有力的,对人类行为的认识和解释更加接近于实际,也促进了新古典经济学的发展。我国在加强金融消费者保护的过程中,应支持行为经济学的发展,重视行为经济学研究成果的应用。
新古典經濟學的嚴密體繫有5箇重要的基礎性假設:完全理性、完全信息、效用最大化、偏好一緻性以及自利性。行為經濟學對這些假設提齣瞭挑戰,指齣:消費者具有繫統性、可預測的行為偏差,新古典經濟學的5箇假設與現實不符;金融機構會利用消費者的行為偏差謀利,導緻競爭非有效。對此,行為經濟學提齣,要在傳統糾正市場失靈方法的基礎上,從更深層麵上糾正消費者行為偏差,需要結閤具體的偏差類型,採取自由放任、政府榦預、市場化取嚮的政府柔性榦預等方式;同時,為更好地保護消費者權益,需要對金融機構進行行為榦預和產品榦預,提高信息披露的有效性,推進金融知識普及和金融消費者能力的建設。行為經濟學動搖不瞭新古典經濟學的統治地位,但其挑戰是有力的,對人類行為的認識和解釋更加接近于實際,也促進瞭新古典經濟學的髮展。我國在加彊金融消費者保護的過程中,應支持行為經濟學的髮展,重視行為經濟學研究成果的應用。
신고전경제학적엄밀체계유5개중요적기출성가설:완전이성、완전신식、효용최대화、편호일치성이급자리성。행위경제학대저사가설제출료도전,지출:소비자구유계통성、가예측적행위편차,신고전경제학적5개가설여현실불부;금융궤구회이용소비자적행위편차모리,도치경쟁비유효。대차,행위경제학제출,요재전통규정시장실령방법적기출상,종경심층면상규정소비자행위편차,수요결합구체적편차류형,채취자유방임、정부간예、시장화취향적정부유성간예등방식;동시,위경호지보호소비자권익,수요대금융궤구진행행위간예화산품간예,제고신식피로적유효성,추진금융지식보급화금융소비자능력적건설。행위경제학동요불료신고전경제학적통치지위,단기도전시유력적,대인류행위적인식화해석경가접근우실제,야촉진료신고전경제학적발전。아국재가강금융소비자보호적과정중,응지지행위경제학적발전,중시행위경제학연구성과적응용。
The new classical economics is based on five important assumptions: perfect information, utility maximization, perfect rationality, preference consistency and self-interest hypothesis. Behavioral economics challenges these assumptions and argues that Consumers are systematically and predictably irrational; those basic assumptions are not consistent with the reality; financial institutions may make a profit by manipulating consumer biases. As a result, market competition may be not effective; in addition to the traditional remedies, policymaker should pay more attention to addressing market failures by correcting consumer biases. Different ways can be employed to correct different consumer biases, including laissez-faire, government interventions and government soft interventions based on the market. To better protect financial consumers, authorities should regulate financial institutions' behaviors, improve the effectiveness of information disclosure, promote financial knowledges and improve consumers' ability. The challenges from behavioral economics are powerful, but it cannot shake the dominant position of the new classical economics. It provides better understanding and explanations of human behaviors and therefore promotes the development of the new classical economics. In the process of strengthening financial consumer protections, China should support the development of behavioral economics and pay more attention to the application of behavioral economics.