教育研究
教育研究
교육연구
Educational Research
2014年
4期
85~93
,共null页
大学本质 大学社会责任 学术性 契约性
大學本質 大學社會責任 學術性 契約性
대학본질 대학사회책임 학술성 계약성
the nature of universities, the social responsibilities of universities （the SRU）, the academic property,the contractual property
大学本质上是融“学术性”与“契约性”为一体的契约联合网络，大学、市场和社会三者之间是“异质共生与互补”的关系，大学社会责任的逻辑起点在于基于交换关系所衍生的“契约性”与“学术性”，其本原性质可表述为基于“学术性”的契约之履行过程。大学社会责任可以分为学术责任、育人责任、政治责任、法律责任与伦理责任，大学社会责任的价值根源在于大学自治与学术自由，大学社会责任履行可通过“学术力量主动”、“市场力量推动”与“社会力量引导”来予以实现。据此，可以构建包含价值根源、实现路径、责任与契约类型等在内的大学社会责任的履约机理模型。大学社会责任的履行要有一个“边界”，其治理要义在于“有限度承担”而非“过度活跃”。
大學本質上是融“學術性”與“契約性”為一體的契約聯閤網絡，大學、市場和社會三者之間是“異質共生與互補”的關繫，大學社會責任的邏輯起點在于基于交換關繫所衍生的“契約性”與“學術性”，其本原性質可錶述為基于“學術性”的契約之履行過程。大學社會責任可以分為學術責任、育人責任、政治責任、法律責任與倫理責任，大學社會責任的價值根源在于大學自治與學術自由，大學社會責任履行可通過“學術力量主動”、“市場力量推動”與“社會力量引導”來予以實現。據此，可以構建包含價值根源、實現路徑、責任與契約類型等在內的大學社會責任的履約機理模型。大學社會責任的履行要有一箇“邊界”，其治理要義在于“有限度承擔”而非“過度活躍”。
대학본질상시융“학술성”여“계약성”위일체적계약연합망락，대학、시장화사회삼자지간시“이질공생여호보”적관계，대학사회책임적라집기점재우기우교환관계소연생적“계약성”여“학술성”，기본원성질가표술위기우“학술성”적계약지리행과정。대학사회책임가이분위학술책임、육인책임、정치책임、법률책임여윤리책임，대학사회책임적개치근원재우대학자치여학술자유，대학사회책임리행가통과“학술역량주동”、“시장역량추동”여“사회역량인도”래여이실현。거차，가이구건포함개치근원、실현로경、책임여계약류형등재내적대학사회책임적리약궤리모형。대학사회책임적리행요유일개“변계”，기치리요의재우“유한도승담”이비“과도활약”。
Essentially speaking, the nature of universities is characteristic of the contract-based network integrating the academic property with the contractual property. The relationship among university, market and society demonstrates their differences in nature but co-existing and being complementary to each other. Logically, the start point of the social responsibilities of universities （SRU） results from the academic property and contractual property, which both grow from the exchange relationship between the different parties. Therefore, the essential property of the SRU can be understood as the contract implementation process guided by and based on ＂the academic property＂. The SRU includes the responsibilities in academy, educating talents, politics, law and ethics, which are all rooted in the self-governance and academic freedom of universities. The realization of these responsibilities can depend upon the driving of academic force, the push of market force, and the guidance of social force. Accordingly, the model of fulfilling-contract mechanism of the SRU can be constructed, which is made up of the roots of value, the realizing paths, responsibilities, and types of contracts. Also, it is supposed to have a clear ＂boundary＂ of the SRU. The governing gist of the SRU lies in ＂the legitimate accountability＂ instead of ＂the over-undertaking＂.
