CAJ | 학술논문

在习惯国际法框架下,当股东直接权利受损时,股东可以以自己名义提出索赔请求,但股东股份价值的减少只能通过外交保护等间接方式得到救济.然而在现代国际投资仲裁体制中,仲裁庭实质上允许了股东直接提出利益损失的仲裁申请.由于现代投资条约缺乏相应的制度构建,使得仲裁庭允许股东直接提出间接索赔的行为引发了相应的风险,侵犯了公司债权人以及相关当事方的权利.为此,有必要借鉴习惯国际法与NAFTA的相关规定,对国际投资条约进行修正.
재습관국제법광가하,당고동직접권리수손시,고동가이이자기명의제출색배청구,단고동고빈개치적감소지능통과외교보호등간접방식득도구제.연이재현대국제투자중재체제중,중재정실질상윤허료고동직접제출이익손실적중재신청.유우현대투자조약결핍상응적제도구건,사득중재정윤허고동직접제출간접색배적행위인발료상응적풍험,침범료공사채권인이급상관당사방적권리.위차,유필요차감습관국제법여NAFTA적상관규정,대국제투자조약진행수정.
In the framework of customary international law, shareholders can claim in its own name when its direct rights was infringed, however, for the loss of value of shareholding in company, shareholder can only be remedied by an indirect way of diplomatic protection. By contrast, in the context of modern international investment arbitration, the arbitral tribunals essentially allow claims by shareholders directly for those reflective loss, due to the lack of corresponding mechanisms in modern investment treaties, the behaviors of arbitral tribunals have attracted many risks, violating the company＇s creditors and related rights of the interested parties, it is therefore necessary to draw on customary international law and relevant provisions of NAFTA to amend the international investment treaties.