CAJ | 학술논문

学界通说认为知识产权质押是权利质押，知识产权质权是权利质权；且为我国《担保法》和《物权法》的立法肯认。通过分析，质疑通说，澄清了知识产权质押的法律性质，纠正认识误区，并指出现有担保法律制度按照“物”的理念和认识来设计知识产权担保制度存在根本的理论缺陷，为发挥知识产权应有价值，提出应将知识产权担保制度从现行担保物权法律制度中独立出来，回归由知识产权法律制度安排。
학계통설인위지식산권질압시권리질압，지식산권질권시권리질권；차위아국《담보법》화《물권법》적입법긍인。통과분석，질의통설，징청료지식산권질압적법률성질，규정인식오구，병지출현유담보법률제도안조“물”적이념화인식래설계지식산권담보제도존재근본적이론결함，위발휘지식산권응유개치，제출응장지식산권담보제도종현행담보물권법률제도중독립출래，회귀유지식산권법률제도안배。
The common view is that intellectual property rights pledge are rights pledge, and it is confirmed in ＂security law＂ and ＂matter right law＂ of our state. Through analysis, it is questioned and the legal nature of the intellectual property rights pledge is clarified, thus the misunderstanding is corrected. It is pointed out that the existing security legal system, including intellectual property rights guarantee system, being arranged in the light of ＂things＂ is of fundamental theoretical defects. To make full use of the value of intellectual property rights, it is put forward that the guarantee system of intellectual property rights should be independent from the existing legal system of real rights for security, be arranged by the intellectual property law system.