南开管理评论
南開管理評論
남개관리평론
Nankai Business Review
2014年
2期
95~106
,共null页
应计盈余管理 真实盈余管理 未来经营业绩 盈余阈值 信号传递
應計盈餘管理 真實盈餘管理 未來經營業績 盈餘閾值 信號傳遞
응계영여관리 진실영여관리 미래경영업적 영여역치 신호전체
Accrual Earnings Management; Real Earnings Management; Future Operating Performance; Earnings Benchmarks; gignaling
本文对比分析了应计盈余管理与真实盈余管理对我国上市公司未来经营业绩的不同影响.研究结果表明,应计与真实盈余管理都会对公司未来经营业绩产生负面影响,且应计盈余管理对公司短期经营业绩的负面影响更大,真实盈余管理对公司长期经营业绩的负面影响更大;公司管理层会使用应计盈余管理或真实盈余管理来满足“盈余阈值”;满足“盈余阈值”的真实盈余管理对公司未来经营业绩具有显著负效应,而满足“盈余阈值”的应计盈余管理对公司未来经营业绩具有显著正效应;仅通过应计盈余管理满足“盈余阈值”的公司比仅通过真实盈余管理满足“盈余阈值”的公司具有更优的未来经营业绩.本文研究结论有助于深化利益相关者对盈余管理经济后果的理解.
本文對比分析瞭應計盈餘管理與真實盈餘管理對我國上市公司未來經營業績的不同影響.研究結果錶明,應計與真實盈餘管理都會對公司未來經營業績產生負麵影響,且應計盈餘管理對公司短期經營業績的負麵影響更大,真實盈餘管理對公司長期經營業績的負麵影響更大;公司管理層會使用應計盈餘管理或真實盈餘管理來滿足“盈餘閾值”;滿足“盈餘閾值”的真實盈餘管理對公司未來經營業績具有顯著負效應,而滿足“盈餘閾值”的應計盈餘管理對公司未來經營業績具有顯著正效應;僅通過應計盈餘管理滿足“盈餘閾值”的公司比僅通過真實盈餘管理滿足“盈餘閾值”的公司具有更優的未來經營業績.本文研究結論有助于深化利益相關者對盈餘管理經濟後果的理解.
본문대비분석료응계영여관리여진실영여관리대아국상시공사미래경영업적적불동영향.연구결과표명,응계여진실영여관리도회대공사미래경영업적산생부면영향,차응계영여관리대공사단기경영업적적부면영향경대,진실영여관리대공사장기경영업적적부면영향경대;공사관리층회사용응계영여관리혹진실영여관리래만족“영여역치”;만족“영여역치”적진실영여관리대공사미래경영업적구유현저부효응,이만족“영여역치”적응계영여관리대공사미래경영업적구유현저정효응;부통과응계영여관리만족“영여역치”적공사비부통과진실영여관리만족“영여역치”적공사구유경우적미래경영업적.본문연구결론유조우심화이익상관자대영여관리경제후과적리해.
By using the financial data of Chinese A-shared listed companies in Shenzhen and Shanghai stock markets, with data coverage from 2006 to 2012, this paper investigates the extent to which accrual earnings management and real earnings management differ in their impacts on future operating performance. Our results show that both accrual and real earnings management have negative effects on firm's future operating performance. Specifically, accrual earnings management plays a more negative role in firm's short-term operating performance, whereas real earnings management has a more negative effect on firm's long-term operating performance. We also find that managers engage in accrual earnings management or real earnings management to just meet earnings benchmarks in order to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Moreover, our evidence indicates that engaging in real earnings management to just meet earnings benchmarks has a significantly negative effect on firm's subsequent operating performance, while engaging in accrual earnings management to just meet earnings benchmarks has a significantly positive effect on firm's subsequent operating performance. Furthermore, firms that only use accrual earnings management to just meet benchmarks have relatively better subsequent operating performance than firms that only use real earn- ings management to just meet benchmarks. A negative association between just meeting earnings benchmarks by using real earnings management and subsequent operating performance suggests that real earnings management damages firm's long-term value and future competitive ability, without significant signaling in future firm performance. A positive association between just meeting earnings benchmarks by using accrual earnings management and subsequent operating performance suggests that accrual earnings management provides benefits to the firms that enable better performance in the future or plays a role in signaling managerial competence or future firm performance. Our results suggest that engaging in accrual earnings management to just meet earnings benchmarks is not opportunistic, but making an efficacy on signaling positive future performance. This study extends extant research investigating the consequences of earnings management and provides deep insight into the consequences of earnings management for regulators and stakeholders.