浙江大学学报:人文社会科学版
浙江大學學報:人文社會科學版
절강대학학보:인문사회과학판
Journal of Zhejiang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
2014年
3期
115~130
,共null页
农村精英 传统精英 新贵精英 再生产机制 权力资源 “言说”机制 中国农村社会结构 乡村变革
農村精英 傳統精英 新貴精英 再生產機製 權力資源 “言說”機製 中國農村社會結構 鄉村變革
농촌정영 전통정영 신귀정영 재생산궤제 권력자원 “언설”궤제 중국농촌사회결구 향촌변혁
rural elite; traditional rural elite; new rural elite; reproductive mechanism; power resources; verbal instruction; Chinese rural social structure; rural reform
改革开放后的中国农村社会结构发生了巨大变化,其中一个关键点就是乡村精英再生产机制的变迁。鲁中三村的精英再生产机制展现了改革开放后中国乡村精英循环或再生产机制的一个侧面,具有典型的个案意义。跨时段调查结果显示,这些村庄的“新贵精英”及其后代打破了“穷根”的诅咒,而传统精英及其后代则实现了“翻身”。当代农村社会结构被再生产的新贵精英与传统精英重新塑造:前者重视以政治体制内的权力资源为主体的各种资源的融合利用,通过体制安排实现了代际传承;后者重视以文化与经济资源为主体的各种资本的再发掘,代际“言说”机制起到巨大作用。随着现代市场经济和城市化进程的不断推进,两者的再生产机制开始趋同,即依赖的再生产资源都开始趋向于文化资源。同时,农村的现代“边缘群体”利用暴力性行为等,也在获取资源的过程中形成了“准精英”群体。
改革開放後的中國農村社會結構髮生瞭巨大變化,其中一箇關鍵點就是鄉村精英再生產機製的變遷。魯中三村的精英再生產機製展現瞭改革開放後中國鄉村精英循環或再生產機製的一箇側麵,具有典型的箇案意義。跨時段調查結果顯示,這些村莊的“新貴精英”及其後代打破瞭“窮根”的詛咒,而傳統精英及其後代則實現瞭“翻身”。噹代農村社會結構被再生產的新貴精英與傳統精英重新塑造:前者重視以政治體製內的權力資源為主體的各種資源的融閤利用,通過體製安排實現瞭代際傳承;後者重視以文化與經濟資源為主體的各種資本的再髮掘,代際“言說”機製起到巨大作用。隨著現代市場經濟和城市化進程的不斷推進,兩者的再生產機製開始趨同,即依賴的再生產資源都開始趨嚮于文化資源。同時,農村的現代“邊緣群體”利用暴力性行為等,也在穫取資源的過程中形成瞭“準精英”群體。
개혁개방후적중국농촌사회결구발생료거대변화,기중일개관건점취시향촌정영재생산궤제적변천。로중삼촌적정영재생산궤제전현료개혁개방후중국향촌정영순배혹재생산궤제적일개측면,구유전형적개안의의。과시단조사결과현시,저사촌장적“신귀정영”급기후대타파료“궁근”적저주,이전통정영급기후대칙실현료“번신”。당대농촌사회결구피재생산적신귀정영여전통정영중신소조:전자중시이정치체제내적권력자원위주체적각충자원적융합이용,통과체제안배실현료대제전승;후자중시이문화여경제자원위주체적각충자본적재발굴,대제“언설”궤제기도거대작용。수착현대시장경제화성시화진정적불단추진,량자적재생산궤제개시추동,즉의뢰적재생산자원도개시추향우문화자원。동시,농촌적현대“변연군체”이용폭력성행위등,야재획취자원적과정중형성료“준정영”군체。
During the second rural reform in the 1980's, the rural economic reform, market economy and urbanization exerted an important effect on the reproduction structure of China's rural elites. Our studies of Village A, Village B and Village H in Shandong Province of China demonstrate one characteristic of the regenerative or the reproductive mechanism of the rural elite after reform and opening up. The "New Rural Elite" (cultivated by the Communist Party of China after 1949) and the "Traditional Rural Elite" (the rural elite before 1949) have experiencedenormous changes. The continuation of generations exemplifies the endogenous change of the contemporary rural structure. One longitudinal study shows that the "New Rural Elite" and their descendants broke the "Qionggen Curse," or the poverty curse, while the "Traditional Rural Elite" and their descendants have achieved Fanshen, or economic revival. The contemporary rural social structure has been reshaped by the new generation of the two elites. The former relies on the resources, chiefly the political power, of the political system, and the economic resources of other institutional arrangements. Their generational succession is then realized by turning these resources into economic support. The latter, on the other hand, relies on the rediscovery of cultural and economic resources. During this process of revival, "verbal instruction," i. e. family teaching by personal example and verbal instruction, is the main recessive mechanism to pass on their characteristics, although the "dominant" economic and power resources play an important role. The verbal instruction is essential for the traditional elite to increase their descendants' human capital and acquire new economic resources and social capital, and to eventually acquire cultural resources to achieve a non-agricultural social identity. With the development of the market economy and the rapid urbanization, the two groups of elites are now relying on the same cultural resources educational opportunities for their children to achieve an urban identity, no matter whether their traditional reproduction has been achieved with political resources or cultural capital accumulation. In addition, the rural marginal population may resort to violence to acquire resources and become the "quasi-elite," which impacts the rural elite structure, but further study is needed to track their reproductive mechanism. This research tries to bring up some open topics in the process of China's urbanization. Will the generative and regenerative mechanisms of the contemporary rural elite change in the future? Will they succeed in achieving non agricultural identities? These are the crucial issues for rural governance and supply-related policies in the future.