体育科学
體育科學
체육과학
China Sport Science
2014年
5期
89~96
,共null页
国际奥委会 委员 仲裁 国际足联
國際奧委會 委員 仲裁 國際足聯
국제오위회 위원 중재 국제족련
International Olympic Committee;committee member ; arbitration ; International Federation of Football Association
国际体育仲裁院负责解决与体育相关的纠纷,其中也不乏国际体育组织委员资格处罚纠纷案例。运用文献分析和逻辑分析的方法,介绍了近年来发生的国际奥委会运动员委员会委员选举违规案和国际足球联合会官员“贿赂”案共3起,归纳和总结了这些仲裁实践对体育法和体育仲裁理论的发展。研究认为,国际体育仲裁院对国际奥委会和国际单项体育联合会的委员资格处罚上诉案件具有管辖权,可通过重审纠正体育组织内部裁决的程序瑕疵,维护上诉人的平等权利;国际体育仲裁院的庭审证据规则突出表现为以被上诉方提供优势证据为主导的共同举证规则和充分体现仲裁庭自由裁量的采证规则;国际体育仲裁院尊重体育组织的自治权,但仍需继续发挥监督、制约职能以防止体育组织权力滥用,并及时提出建议以完善体育组织的规章,从而促进仲裁裁决的客观、公正,保护当事人的正当权益。
國際體育仲裁院負責解決與體育相關的糾紛,其中也不乏國際體育組織委員資格處罰糾紛案例。運用文獻分析和邏輯分析的方法,介紹瞭近年來髮生的國際奧委會運動員委員會委員選舉違規案和國際足毬聯閤會官員“賄賂”案共3起,歸納和總結瞭這些仲裁實踐對體育法和體育仲裁理論的髮展。研究認為,國際體育仲裁院對國際奧委會和國際單項體育聯閤會的委員資格處罰上訴案件具有管轄權,可通過重審糾正體育組織內部裁決的程序瑕疵,維護上訴人的平等權利;國際體育仲裁院的庭審證據規則突齣錶現為以被上訴方提供優勢證據為主導的共同舉證規則和充分體現仲裁庭自由裁量的採證規則;國際體育仲裁院尊重體育組織的自治權,但仍需繼續髮揮鑑督、製約職能以防止體育組織權力濫用,併及時提齣建議以完善體育組織的規章,從而促進仲裁裁決的客觀、公正,保護噹事人的正噹權益。
국제체육중재원부책해결여체육상관적규분,기중야불핍국제체육조직위원자격처벌규분안례。운용문헌분석화라집분석적방법,개소료근년래발생적국제오위회운동원위원회위원선거위규안화국제족구연합회관원“회뢰”안공3기,귀납화총결료저사중재실천대체육법화체육중재이론적발전。연구인위,국제체육중재원대국제오위회화국제단항체육연합회적위원자격처벌상소안건구유관할권,가통과중심규정체육조직내부재결적정서하자,유호상소인적평등권리;국제체육중재원적정심증거규칙돌출표현위이피상소방제공우세증거위주도적공동거증규칙화충분체현중재정자유재량적채증규칙;국제체육중재원존중체육조직적자치권,단잉수계속발휘감독、제약직능이방지체육조직권력람용,병급시제출건의이완선체육조직적규장,종이촉진중재재결적객관、공정,보호당사인적정당권익。
Abstract: The Court of Arbitration for Sport is responsible for resolving sports-related dis- putes, which also include penalty dispute cases of members of the international sports organi- zations. This paper, employing the method of literature review and logical analysis, introduces and comments specifically three cases occurred in recent years, including the International Olympic Committee Athletes Commission members' election violation cases and the official " bribery" case of International Federation of Football Association, summarizes these practices of Arbitration on the development of Sports Law and that of the theory of Arbitration for Sports. The result suggests that the Court of Arbitration for Sport has jurisdiction to decide the penalty disputes by the International Olympic Committee and the International Sports Federations, which can correct the proceeding flaws of sports organizations internal penalty by the Panel's review and maintain equal rights of the appellants; its evidence rules are especially the common given evidence rules with the respondent providing preponderant evidence, and the admissibility evidence rules of fully reflecting the discretion of the arbitral tribunal; the Court of Arbitration for Sport respects the autonomy of sports organizations, but still has to continue to perform an oversight function to prevent sports organizations from the abuse of power, and timely makes its suggestion to improve regulation of sports organizations in order to promote the objective and justice of arbitration ruling and safeguard the legitimate rights of the parties.