心理学报
心理學報
심이학보
Acta Psychologica Sinica
2014年
5期
656~665
,共null页
窦伟伟 郑希付 杨慧芳 王俊芳 李悦 俄小天 陈倩倩
竇偉偉 鄭希付 楊慧芳 王俊芳 李悅 俄小天 陳倩倩
두위위 정희부 양혜방 왕준방 리열 아소천 진천천
认知分心 LPP 背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC) N2 认知控制
認知分心 LPP 揹外側前額葉皮層(DLPFC) N2 認知控製
인지분심 LPP 배외측전액협피층(DLPFC) N2 인지공제
cognitive distraction; Late positive potential (LPP); DLPFC; N2; cognitive control
结合ERP技术、创伤电影范式和改进的工作记忆范式探讨了认知分心的强度对创伤性信息加工的影响。结果发现,(1)高负荷上的N2波幅显著大于低负荷上的。(2)在低工作记忆负荷上,创伤负性图引发的LPP 波幅显著大于创伤中性图和无关中性图;而在高工作记忆负荷上,三类图片引发的 LPP 波之间差异不再显著。(3)在创伤负性图上高、低负荷工作记忆任务诱发的LPP波差异显著,且高负荷条件下的LPP波幅显著小于低负荷条件。结果表明,相比低认知控制,早期高认知控制对创伤性信息的调节更有效,支持了认知控制理论。
結閤ERP技術、創傷電影範式和改進的工作記憶範式探討瞭認知分心的彊度對創傷性信息加工的影響。結果髮現,(1)高負荷上的N2波幅顯著大于低負荷上的。(2)在低工作記憶負荷上,創傷負性圖引髮的LPP 波幅顯著大于創傷中性圖和無關中性圖;而在高工作記憶負荷上,三類圖片引髮的 LPP 波之間差異不再顯著。(3)在創傷負性圖上高、低負荷工作記憶任務誘髮的LPP波差異顯著,且高負荷條件下的LPP波幅顯著小于低負荷條件。結果錶明,相比低認知控製,早期高認知控製對創傷性信息的調節更有效,支持瞭認知控製理論。
결합ERP기술、창상전영범식화개진적공작기억범식탐토료인지분심적강도대창상성신식가공적영향。결과발현,(1)고부하상적N2파폭현저대우저부하상적。(2)재저공작기억부하상,창상부성도인발적LPP 파폭현저대우창상중성도화무관중성도;이재고공작기억부하상,삼류도편인발적 LPP 파지간차이불재현저。(3)재창상부성도상고、저부하공작기억임무유발적LPP파차이현저,차고부하조건하적LPP파폭현저소우저부하조건。결과표명,상비저인지공제,조기고인지공제대창상성신식적조절경유효,지지료인지공제이론。
The visual-spatial resource competition theory suggests that the frequency of flashback could be reduced, when a visual task competes with trauma-related negative pictures for the limited space resources. However, the cognitive control theory hold the view that the central executive control system, as the core of the working memory system, compete with trauma-related negative images for the cognitive control ability. And this ability can be reflected by intense cognitive distraction tasks, indexed by N2 and the late positive potential (LPP) at the neural level. However, it is unclear how the intensity of cognitive distraction modulates the neural processing of the trauma-related information. The present event-related potentials (ERP) study used the traumatic film paradigm and improved working memory paradigm to investigate the effect of cognitive distraction’s intensity on the process of trauma-related information. Two parts consisted of the experiment: watching the traumatic film and completing working memory task. Before and after watching the traumatic film, 22 Participants completed PANAS, but the STAI scale was used only before the film. During the working memory task, participants were told to perform a task which requiring to memorize letters at the beginning. Each trial began with a two-or six-letter string presented on a black background for 5, 000 ms. Next, a white fixation cross appeared for 500~1, 000 ms, followed by a trauma-related picture or a unrelated neutral picture in random order for 2,000 ms. Then, the words ‘what were the letters?’ were presented on the screen. In the following, participants pressed the key of‘Enter’ and typed the letters in the black empty screen in the order they had memorized them. Participants could use the backspace key to correct mistakes. The trial ended when participants pressed the enter key again when they finished typing letters. The trial interval varied randomly from 2,000 to 2,500 ms, during which a white fixation cross was presented on a black background. The EEG was recorded while the picture appeared. Participants then completed PANAS again after the working memory task. The results showed that:(1) the amplitudes of N2 to the high-load task were significantly larger than those of low-load task;(2) the amplitudes of LPP for trauma-related negative pictures were larger than trauma-related neutral and unrelated neutral pictures in the low-load task, whereas there were no significant differences among the three kinds of pictures in the high-load task; (3) for the trauma-related negative pictures, LPP activity was significantly greater to the high-load task than the low-load task. The results of the present study indicated that the cognitive distraction of the high-load task had a stronger modulation to trauma-related information. This provided support for the cognitive control theory.