中国工业经济
中國工業經濟
중국공업경제
China Industrial Economy
2014年
5期
44~56
,共null页
混合寡头 合作研发 合谋 反垄断
混閤寡頭 閤作研髮 閤謀 反壟斷
혼합과두 합작연발 합모 반롱단
mixed oligopoly; R&D cooperation; collusion; anti-trust
在混合所有制经济中,厂商的产权结构将影响合作研发的效率及福利结果,并使合作研发后可能形成合谋的反垄断控制标准发生变化。本文使用部分私有化的混合寡头模型对以上问题进行研究.结果显示厂商的研发投入水平与混合所有制厂商中的非国有资本比重正相关,但消费者剩余及社会总福利与非国有资本比重的关系呈倒U型。当混合所有制厂商中的国有产权比重较高时.混合所有制厂商在“市场换技术”的目标下有动力与非国有资本厂商在产品市场中合谋.这种情形下的合谋能够提高社会总福利.并构成了本文所定义的合意合谋;当混合所有制厂商中的国有产权比重较低时,混合所有制厂商同样有动力参与合谋,但此时合谋将对社会总福利造成损害;此外厂商合谋的稳定性在混合所有制下更高。从反垄断控制的角度,以上结果显示,在混合所有制下对厂商合作研发后的合谋应适用合理推定的原则进行判断。
在混閤所有製經濟中,廠商的產權結構將影響閤作研髮的效率及福利結果,併使閤作研髮後可能形成閤謀的反壟斷控製標準髮生變化。本文使用部分私有化的混閤寡頭模型對以上問題進行研究.結果顯示廠商的研髮投入水平與混閤所有製廠商中的非國有資本比重正相關,但消費者剩餘及社會總福利與非國有資本比重的關繫呈倒U型。噹混閤所有製廠商中的國有產權比重較高時.混閤所有製廠商在“市場換技術”的目標下有動力與非國有資本廠商在產品市場中閤謀.這種情形下的閤謀能夠提高社會總福利.併構成瞭本文所定義的閤意閤謀;噹混閤所有製廠商中的國有產權比重較低時,混閤所有製廠商同樣有動力參與閤謀,但此時閤謀將對社會總福利造成損害;此外廠商閤謀的穩定性在混閤所有製下更高。從反壟斷控製的角度,以上結果顯示,在混閤所有製下對廠商閤作研髮後的閤謀應適用閤理推定的原則進行判斷。
재혼합소유제경제중,엄상적산권결구장영향합작연발적효솔급복리결과,병사합작연발후가능형성합모적반롱단공제표준발생변화。본문사용부분사유화적혼합과두모형대이상문제진행연구.결과현시엄상적연발투입수평여혼합소유제엄상중적비국유자본비중정상관,단소비자잉여급사회총복리여비국유자본비중적관계정도U형。당혼합소유제엄상중적국유산권비중교고시.혼합소유제엄상재“시장환기술”적목표하유동력여비국유자본엄상재산품시장중합모.저충정형하적합모능구제고사회총복리.병구성료본문소정의적합의합모;당혼합소유제엄상중적국유산권비중교저시,혼합소유제엄상동양유동력삼여합모,단차시합모장대사회총복리조성손해;차외엄상합모적은정성재혼합소유제하경고。종반롱단공제적각도,이상결과현시,재혼합소유제하대엄상합작연발후적합모응괄용합리추정적원칙진행판단。
The firm's property structure will impact the efficiency and welfare of R&D cooperation under mixed ownership economy, and also impact anti-trust control standards of the collusion after R&D cooperation. This paper uses mixed oligopoly to research these issues, the results show that R&D investment level of the firm is positively correlated with the proportion of non-state-owned property, but the relationship of consumer surplus and social welfare to the proportion of non-state-owned property is inverted U-shape. When the proportion of stated- owned property is higher, the mixed ownership firm has an incentive to be in collusion with non-state-owned firm, and this kind of collusion will improve the total social welfare. When the proportion of stated-owned property is lower, the mixed ownership firm also has an incentive to be in collusion with non-state-owned firm, but the collusion will harm the total social welfare. In addition, the collusion under mixed ownership economy is higher stability. These results indicate that we should use the rule of reason principle to judge the collusion under mixed ownership economy.