管理工程学报
管理工程學報
관리공정학보
Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
2014年
2期
17~25
,共null页
产业结构 产业部门 投入产出 网络分析
產業結構 產業部門 投入產齣 網絡分析
산업결구 산업부문 투입산출 망락분석
industrial structure ; industrial departments ; input and output ; network analysis
G7和BRIC分别代表经济发展水平最高的发达国家和发展中国家,具有不同工业化进程的产业结构演进特点.本文基于1995-2005年的投入产出数据,运用社会网络分析方法,从网络结构的视角对比研究了G7与BRIC产业结构的演进.实证结果表明:十一个国家在产业结构网络特征的变化上存在很大不同,而G7三大产业网络特征的变化趋势一致,BRIC却没有一致性;BRIC基本处于工业化中期,与发达国家的工业化程度差距较大;中国的产业结构演进与其他国家有明显的区别,主要表现在产业中心集中化、三大产业中心性都有提高以及第三产业部门弱势等.最后探讨了中国产业结构演进异质化的原因,并提出相应建议.
G7和BRIC分彆代錶經濟髮展水平最高的髮達國傢和髮展中國傢,具有不同工業化進程的產業結構縯進特點.本文基于1995-2005年的投入產齣數據,運用社會網絡分析方法,從網絡結構的視角對比研究瞭G7與BRIC產業結構的縯進.實證結果錶明:十一箇國傢在產業結構網絡特徵的變化上存在很大不同,而G7三大產業網絡特徵的變化趨勢一緻,BRIC卻沒有一緻性;BRIC基本處于工業化中期,與髮達國傢的工業化程度差距較大;中國的產業結構縯進與其他國傢有明顯的區彆,主要錶現在產業中心集中化、三大產業中心性都有提高以及第三產業部門弱勢等.最後探討瞭中國產業結構縯進異質化的原因,併提齣相應建議.
G7화BRIC분별대표경제발전수평최고적발체국가화발전중국가,구유불동공업화진정적산업결구연진특점.본문기우1995-2005년적투입산출수거,운용사회망락분석방법,종망락결구적시각대비연구료G7여BRIC산업결구적연진.실증결과표명:십일개국가재산업결구망락특정적변화상존재흔대불동,이G7삼대산업망락특정적변화추세일치,BRIC각몰유일치성;BRIC기본처우공업화중기,여발체국가적공업화정도차거교대;중국적산업결구연진여기타국가유명현적구별,주요표현재산업중심집중화、삼대산업중심성도유제고이급제삼산업부문약세등.최후탐토료중국산업결구연진이질화적원인,병제출상응건의.
China's industrial structure is entering the adjustment period after rapid economic growth period.How to adjust the industrial structure in China will affect its future economic development.G7 and BRIC represent primary developed countries and developing countries.These countries have different industrialization levels.Understanding the industrial structure evolution of G7 and BRI provides important implications for China to find a suitable adjustment mode of industrial structure.Input-output model is the most commonly used method in the present industrial structure research.However,the model does not reflect the network relationship between industries.Moreover,the existing researches often lack of international view.This paper makes contributions mainly from three aspects:(1) expanding previous studies by analyzing primary developed countries and developing countries,including G7 and BRIC; (2) extending the time frame and analyzing those countries' industrial structure evolution from 1995 to 2005; and (3) adopting the Social Network Analysis method (SNA) to research industrial structure evolution and emphasizing network relationships.Based on input-output (i-o) data from 1995-2005,this paper uses the network analysis method to study evolution of industrial structure of G7 and BRIC from the perspective of network structure.The analysis results show that countries have different change trends in industrial structure network.G7 have the same change trend as three major industries; however,BRIC do not have.BRIC countries are in the process of industrialization and have big gap compared with the developed countries.China ‘s industrial structure evolution is distinctly different from other countries' in three aspects:(1) Heavy industry and simple manufacturing are importance divisions in the industrial network,and service industry has insufficient influence in the industrial structure.(2) During the industrial structure evolution,the industrial centers have concentrated and the industrial connection has enhanced.(3) The centrality of all three major industries have increased,which is different from other ten countries.China's heterogeneous industrial structure evolution mainly includes production factor endowment,comparative advantage between different countries,international industrial division and industrial policies.In order to optimize the industrial structure and promote the sustainable economic development,we suggest Chinese government should continuously improve the production factor market,alert the comparative advantage trap,speed up the financial and insurance reform,and improve the ability of independent innovation and other measures.