CAJ | 학술논문

风险刑法所关注的风险（危险）已经不局限于风险社会理论中的典型的现代性风险，抽象危险犯原本不是风险刑法的产物。抽象危险犯除了有法益保护前置化和积极的一般预防理论的支撑外，避免证明上的困难也是重要的、独立的理由。抽象危险犯的抽象危险可以是强制性推定的，但大多数是可以反驳的。抽象危险犯不同于行为犯、具体危险犯和行政犯，有独立存在的必要。对抽象危险犯的立法应当限制。对推定抽象危险的犯罪，司法认定需要进行两个层次的判断。对抽象危险推定的反驳并不意味着举证责任的转移。
풍험형법소관주적풍험（위험）이경불국한우풍험사회이론중적전형적현대성풍험，추상위험범원본불시풍험형법적산물。추상위험범제료유법익보호전치화화적겁적일반예방이론적지탱외，피면증명상적곤난야시중요적、독립적이유。추상위험범적추상위험가이시강제성추정적，단대다수시가이반박적。추상위험범불동우행위범、구체위험범화행정범，유독립존재적필요。대추상위험범적입법응당한제。대추정추상위험적범죄，사법인정수요진행량개층차적판단。대추상위험추정적반박병불의미착거증책임적전이。
Risk criminal law do limit its concern on typical modern risk in the risk social theory. Abstract dangerous crime is not originally the product of risk criminal law. In addition to the theoretic support by the pre - positive protection of legal interests and actively general prevention theory, the important and independent reason is to avoid the proof difficulty. The abstract danger of abstract dangerous crime can be mandatory presumption, but most of it can be refuted. Abstract dan- gerous crime is different from behavior crime, specific dangerous crime and administrative crime. It is necessary for abstract dangerous crime to exist independently. The legislation for abstract dangerous crime should be limited. Judicial determination to presume abstract danger of a crime needs two levels of judgment. The refuting to the presumption of abstract danger does not mean the transfer of the burden of proof.