工业工程
工業工程
공업공정
Industrial Engineering Journal
2014年
2期
43~48
,共null页
眼动 视觉搜索 经验水平
眼動 視覺搜索 經驗水平
안동 시각수색 경험수평
eye movements; visual search; experience level
目前视觉搜索的相关研究对细节关注甚少。安检是一项特殊的视觉搜索过程,了解其工作过程对改善其工作质量意义重大,因此,有必要对其细节进行研究。选取两组被试进行安检模拟实验,以研究现行安检原则“先难后易,先复杂后简单”的可行性以及两组被试视觉特征的差异。结合两组被试的特点,对数据进行了筛选、统计,运用非参数检验综合分析了两组被试实验数据的差异,并应用专家打分法分析两组被试视觉搜索过程的差异。结果表明,两组被试在注视时间百分比、眼跳距离、判断正确率上存在显著差异,安检员组的正确率比学生组高28.7%;安检员组的注视持续时间较短,有超过75%的注视点持续时间小于200ms,而学生组处于该时间段的注视点只占17%左右;安检员组在模拟实验中倾向于遵循安检原则进行系统搜索,而学生组倾向于随机搜索。
目前視覺搜索的相關研究對細節關註甚少。安檢是一項特殊的視覺搜索過程,瞭解其工作過程對改善其工作質量意義重大,因此,有必要對其細節進行研究。選取兩組被試進行安檢模擬實驗,以研究現行安檢原則“先難後易,先複雜後簡單”的可行性以及兩組被試視覺特徵的差異。結閤兩組被試的特點,對數據進行瞭篩選、統計,運用非參數檢驗綜閤分析瞭兩組被試實驗數據的差異,併應用專傢打分法分析兩組被試視覺搜索過程的差異。結果錶明,兩組被試在註視時間百分比、眼跳距離、判斷正確率上存在顯著差異,安檢員組的正確率比學生組高28.7%;安檢員組的註視持續時間較短,有超過75%的註視點持續時間小于200ms,而學生組處于該時間段的註視點隻佔17%左右;安檢員組在模擬實驗中傾嚮于遵循安檢原則進行繫統搜索,而學生組傾嚮于隨機搜索。
목전시각수색적상관연구대세절관주심소。안검시일항특수적시각수색과정,료해기공작과정대개선기공작질량의의중대,인차,유필요대기세절진행연구。선취량조피시진행안검모의실험,이연구현행안검원칙“선난후역,선복잡후간단”적가행성이급량조피시시각특정적차이。결합량조피시적특점,대수거진행료사선、통계,운용비삼수검험종합분석료량조피시실험수거적차이,병응용전가타분법분석량조피시시각수색과정적차이。결과표명,량조피시재주시시간백분비、안도거리、판단정학솔상존재현저차이,안검원조적정학솔비학생조고28.7%;안검원조적주시지속시간교단,유초과75%적주시점지속시간소우200ms,이학생조처우해시간단적주시점지점17%좌우;안검원조재모의실험중경향우준순안검원칙진행계통수색,이학생조경향우수궤수색。
Currently, little attention is paid on the details of the research on visual search. Security screening is a special visual search process, and understanding this process is the premise of improvement. It is necessary to learn the visual search details in security screening. To test the rationality of the current security principle (from difficult to easy, from complex to simple) and the difference between the two groups, two groups (screener's group and student's group) are selected to conduct a screening simulation experiment. Based on statistical analysis, by combining with the characteristics of the two groups, a non- parametric test is applied to analyze the differences on some parameters. Expert grading method is used to analyze the searching process. Results reveal that there are significant differences on fixation time percent, saccade distance, and judgment accuracy between the two groups. The screener's correct rate is 28.7% higher than student's, while screener's fixation duration is shorter. There are more than 75% of the fixation points lasting for less than 200 ms, while student's is about 17%. The screener's group tends to do system- ic searching under the principle of screening, while the student's group prefers random searching.