心理发展与教育
心理髮展與教育
심리발전여교육
Psychological Development and Education
2014年
3期
277~283
,共null页
李伟健 谢瑞波 陈海德 黄杰
李偉健 謝瑞波 陳海德 黃傑
리위건 사서파 진해덕 황걸
学习时间分配 时间限制 议程 习惯性反应 眼动
學習時間分配 時間限製 議程 習慣性反應 眼動
학습시간분배 시간한제 의정 습관성반응 안동
study time allocation; time limitation; agenda-driven; habitual response; eye tracking technique
采用眼动记录技术,操作三种词对位置,探讨议程与习惯性反应对学习时间分配的影响。实验一设置无时间限制条件,结果发现,20名大学生被试均优先选择左边的项目,项目的自定步调学习时间不存在词对位置效应。结果表明,被试的习惯性反应影响项目选择,不影响自定步调学习时间。实验二设置有时间限制条件,结果发现,20名大学生被试均优先选择容易项目并分配更多的时间学习容易项目,且容易项目的选择存在词对位置效应。结果表明,议程驱动主导被试的项目选择和自定步调学习时间,但不能完全消除习惯性反应对项目选择的影响。
採用眼動記錄技術,操作三種詞對位置,探討議程與習慣性反應對學習時間分配的影響。實驗一設置無時間限製條件,結果髮現,20名大學生被試均優先選擇左邊的項目,項目的自定步調學習時間不存在詞對位置效應。結果錶明,被試的習慣性反應影響項目選擇,不影響自定步調學習時間。實驗二設置有時間限製條件,結果髮現,20名大學生被試均優先選擇容易項目併分配更多的時間學習容易項目,且容易項目的選擇存在詞對位置效應。結果錶明,議程驅動主導被試的項目選擇和自定步調學習時間,但不能完全消除習慣性反應對項目選擇的影響。
채용안동기록기술,조작삼충사대위치,탐토의정여습관성반응대학습시간분배적영향。실험일설치무시간한제조건,결과발현,20명대학생피시균우선선택좌변적항목,항목적자정보조학습시간불존재사대위치효응。결과표명,피시적습관성반응영향항목선택,불영향자정보조학습시간。실험이설치유시간한제조건,결과발현,20명대학생피시균우선선택용역항목병분배경다적시간학습용역항목,차용역항목적선택존재사대위치효응。결과표명,의정구동주도피시적항목선택화자정보조학습시간,단불능완전소제습관성반응대항목선택적영향。
Ariel, Dunlosky and Bailey (2009) proposed Agenda-Based Regulation (ABR) framework. This explains the internal mechanisms of study time allocation from the perspective of information processing, that learners develop an agenda on how to allocate time to various study items and use this agenda when selecting items for study. When the limits of the central executive have been exceeded, habitual responses may gain control of study-time allocation.
This study aims to revealed the habitual response of the study time allocation. It further explored the relationship between the habitual response of the study time allocation and agenda-driven. Using Metcalfe's paradigm, two experiments independently were conducted in present research to examined twenty undergraduates's habitual response on study time allocation on condition of different time limit. Multi-factor experimental design was employed in this study. The independent variables were item difficulty, and words position, and the dependent variables were fixation duration and fixation points. On condition of no time limitation, the result revealed that habitual responses on item selection was found, but no effects on the self-paced study time. On condition of a time limit, there was no habitual response on study time allocation. Learners gave preference to easy items in all three words position. However, for easy items, there were also habitual responses. Which demonstrates learners' agendas can dominate item selection and self-paced study time, but can not completely eliminate the habitual responses to the item selection.