林业经济
林業經濟
임업경제
Forestry Economics
2014年
5期
20~25
,共null页
国有林区 职工家庭收入 山上、山下家庭收入 影响因素
國有林區 職工傢庭收入 山上、山下傢庭收入 影響因素
국유림구 직공가정수입 산상、산하가정수입 영향인소
national forest areas; worker households income; income from living on mountain and under mountain; influencing factors
利用重点国有林区民生监测的调查数据,运用OLS回归模型对黑龙江省国有林区的607个样本进行了实证研究。研究表明:重点国有林区职工家庭收入低于城镇但高于农村。其工资性收入低于全国和黑龙江省的城镇;家庭经营收入低于全国和黑龙江省的农村。山上职工家庭人均收入高于山下职工家庭。山上职工家庭收入以工资性收入和家庭经营收入为主,而山下职工家庭收入以工资性收入和转移性收入为主。家庭劳动力数量对山上职工家庭收入有显著影响,而家庭非劳动力数量对山下职工家庭收入有显著影响。山上职工家庭利用管护经营的林地从事林下种养殖和林下采集等林下经济活动,对其家庭收入有所贡献。山上和山下职工家庭的收入并不因其家庭所在林业局的管理机构以及提供的扶持政策等而受影响。
利用重點國有林區民生鑑測的調查數據,運用OLS迴歸模型對黑龍江省國有林區的607箇樣本進行瞭實證研究。研究錶明:重點國有林區職工傢庭收入低于城鎮但高于農村。其工資性收入低于全國和黑龍江省的城鎮;傢庭經營收入低于全國和黑龍江省的農村。山上職工傢庭人均收入高于山下職工傢庭。山上職工傢庭收入以工資性收入和傢庭經營收入為主,而山下職工傢庭收入以工資性收入和轉移性收入為主。傢庭勞動力數量對山上職工傢庭收入有顯著影響,而傢庭非勞動力數量對山下職工傢庭收入有顯著影響。山上職工傢庭利用管護經營的林地從事林下種養殖和林下採集等林下經濟活動,對其傢庭收入有所貢獻。山上和山下職工傢庭的收入併不因其傢庭所在林業跼的管理機構以及提供的扶持政策等而受影響。
이용중점국유림구민생감측적조사수거,운용OLS회귀모형대흑룡강성국유림구적607개양본진행료실증연구。연구표명:중점국유림구직공가정수입저우성진단고우농촌。기공자성수입저우전국화흑룡강성적성진;가정경영수입저우전국화흑룡강성적농촌。산상직공가정인균수입고우산하직공가정。산상직공가정수입이공자성수입화가정경영수입위주,이산하직공가정수입이공자성수입화전이성수입위주。가정노동력수량대산상직공가정수입유현저영향,이가정비노동력수량대산하직공가정수입유현저영향。산상직공가정이용관호경영적임지종사림하충양식화림하채집등림하경제활동,대기가정수입유소공헌。산상화산하직공가정적수입병불인기가정소재임업국적관리궤구이급제공적부지정책등이수영향。
According to livelihood survey data of the key national forest areas, the paper uses OLS regression modelto the empirical research for 607 samples data in key national forest areas of Heilongjiang province. From the studysome results can be found as follows: worker households' income in key national forest areas is lower than town buthigher than countryside, particularly, worker households' salary income is lower than the national and Heilonfijiangprovince town; its revenue is lower than the national and Heilongjiang province countryside. Worker households liv-ing on mountain of per capita income is higher than living under mountain. Income of worker households living onmountain mainly makes up with salary income and income of household revenue, but income of worker householdsliving under mountain mainly makes up with salary income and transfer income. The number of labor worker house-holds has a significant effect on worker households living on mountain income, however, the number of non-laborworker households has a significant effect on worker households living under mountain income. Worker householdsliving on mountain take advantage of the management and operation of forestland to work on under-forest economic activities, for example forest breeding and planting. Worker households living on mountain and living undermountain make no difference by the management institution of forest industrial bureaus and the supporting policy.