CAJ | 학술논문

以国家图书馆和31家省级公共图书馆为研究对象，采用网络调研、问卷调查、有效性测试等方法．对中国图书馆的移动服务现状进行调研．并与美国排名前25位的公共图书馆的移动服务进行对比分析。结果表明：中国公共图书馆移动服务普及率偏低，服务模式主要为WAP和APP；移动服务和移动资源较为丰富，移动服务具有良好的个性和交互性．但存在移动服务体系不完整、移动服务缺乏创新性、知晓度较低、有效性整体不高等问题。中美公共图书馆的移动服务各有所长，中国图书馆提供了更为丰富的移动服务和移动资源，而美国图书馆移动服务更加人性化和精细化，与移动终端结合得更好，馆藏信息的展示效果较好。图6。表3。参考文献37。
이국가도서관화31가성급공공도서관위연구대상，채용망락조연、문권조사、유효성측시등방법．대중국도서관적이동복무현상진행조연．병여미국배명전25위적공공도서관적이동복무진행대비분석。결과표명：중국공공도서관이동복무보급솔편저，복무모식주요위WAP화APP；이동복무화이동자원교위봉부，이동복무구유량호적개성화교호성．단존재이동복무체계불완정、이동복무결핍창신성、지효도교저、유효성정체불고등문제。중미공공도서관적이동복무각유소장，중국도서관제공료경위봉부적이동복무화이동자원，이미국도서관이동복무경가인성화화정세화，여이동종단결합득경호，관장신식적전시효과교호。도6。표3。삼고문헌37。
Based on the method of online investigation, questionnaires and effectiveness tests, we investigated the national library and thirty-one provincial public libraries for evaluating current status of mobile library. Comparative analysis of mobile service was carried out between the public libraries of China and the top 25 US public libraries. The result shows that： currently, mobile service in China is less widespread and the mode of mobile service mainly focuses on WAP and APP; mobile libraries provide diverse mobile services and abundant library resources, and the service is personalized and interactive. However, the process of mobile library service is not faultless, and mobile service lacks novelty, and has low awareness and insufficient effec- tiveness. Both Chinese and American public libraries have some advantages. Public libraries in China provide more rich services and resources. And mobile services among US public libraries possess more humanization and refinement. Mobile services are better combined with the mobile terminals, and have a rich collection of information display. 6 figs. 3 tabs. 37 refs.