中国图书馆学报
中國圖書館學報
중국도서관학보
The Journal of The Library Science in China
2014年
3期
64~77
,共null页
安璐 余传明 李纲 张萱
安璐 餘傳明 李綱 張萱
안로 여전명 리강 장훤
图书情报学 自组织映射 研究领域 科研机构
圖書情報學 自組織映射 研究領域 科研機構
도서정보학 자조직영사 연구영역 과연궤구
Library and information science. Self-organizing Map. Research field. Research institutions.
科研机构在科学研究和技术创新过程中发挥着重要作用,对不同国家科研机构的研究领域进行分析有助于促进相互学习并提高合作的可能性。本文利用自组织映射(SOM)人工神经网络方法对87所中美图书馆学情报学(LIS)科研机构在技术维度的图书情报学领域研究进行可视化比较分析。研究发现,中美图情科研机构都与本国同行具有更相似的研究领域。根据其研究领域的相似性,共识别出八组国际潜在合作机构和七组国内潜在合作机构.最后分析了中美图情机构的热点与特色研究领域。该研究发现有助于更好地了解中美国晴机构在技术维度的图书情报学研究领域的相似性与差异,为相关科研机构寻找潜在的合作对象,跟踪国外热点研究领域,发现自身研究的不足提供决策支持。图1。表6。参考文献42。附录1。
科研機構在科學研究和技術創新過程中髮揮著重要作用,對不同國傢科研機構的研究領域進行分析有助于促進相互學習併提高閤作的可能性。本文利用自組織映射(SOM)人工神經網絡方法對87所中美圖書館學情報學(LIS)科研機構在技術維度的圖書情報學領域研究進行可視化比較分析。研究髮現,中美圖情科研機構都與本國同行具有更相似的研究領域。根據其研究領域的相似性,共識彆齣八組國際潛在閤作機構和七組國內潛在閤作機構.最後分析瞭中美圖情機構的熱點與特色研究領域。該研究髮現有助于更好地瞭解中美國晴機構在技術維度的圖書情報學研究領域的相似性與差異,為相關科研機構尋找潛在的閤作對象,跟蹤國外熱點研究領域,髮現自身研究的不足提供決策支持。圖1。錶6。參攷文獻42。附錄1。
과연궤구재과학연구화기술창신과정중발휘착중요작용,대불동국가과연궤구적연구영역진행분석유조우촉진상호학습병제고합작적가능성。본문이용자조직영사(SOM)인공신경망락방법대87소중미도서관학정보학(LIS)과연궤구재기술유도적도서정보학영역연구진행가시화비교분석。연구발현,중미도정과연궤구도여본국동행구유경상사적연구영역。근거기연구영역적상사성,공식별출팔조국제잠재합작궤구화칠조국내잠재합작궤구.최후분석료중미도정궤구적열점여특색연구영역。해연구발현유조우경호지료해중미국청궤구재기술유도적도서정보학연구영역적상사성여차이,위상관과연궤구심조잠재적합작대상,근종국외열점연구영역,발현자신연구적불족제공결책지지。도1。표6。삼고문헌42。부록1。
Research institutions play an important role in scientific research and technical innovation. The research field a- nalysis of research institutions in different coumries can facilitate mutual learning and promote potential collaboration. In this study, we employed Serf-organizing Map(SOM) technique, an artificial neural network to visually compare technical library and information science(LIS) research fields between 87 Chinese and American LIS research institutions. The findings revealed that both Chinese and American LIS institutions tended to have more similar technical LIS research fields to their domestic counter- parts than to those in the other country. Eight groups of potential international collaborators and seven groups of potential domes- tic collaborators were presented based upon their research similarities. The salient and distinguished feature research fields of Chinese and American LIS institutions were analyzed. The findings of this study lead to a better understanding of the similarities and differences among Chinese and American LIS institutions in terms of technical LIS research fields and provide decision sup- port for related institutions to seek potential collaborators, to keep up with foreign salient research fields, and to identify the re- search weaknesses of their own. l fig. 6 tabs. 42 rofs. 1 appendix.