成都体育学院学报
成都體育學院學報
성도체육학원학보
Journal of Chengdu Physical Education Institute
2014年
5期
13~18
,共null页
体育武术 权力 谱系学 谱系构建
體育武術 權力 譜繫學 譜繫構建
체육무술 권력 보계학 보계구건
sports martial arts ; power; genealogy ; genealogy construction
近代以来,在历经“土洋之争”及其“武术性质大讨论”后,形成了体育武术思想.文章以谱系学方法,打破原本已经约定俗成的武术史叙事文本,重新建构体育武术思想,探索新方法解读武术理论的学术魅力.研究认为:武术作为一种展示身体的文化,体育武术思想深刻记录了谱系学所关注的权力与知识关系的印迹;体育武术思想是发端于“土洋武术之争”,在“体育化”话语的控释下,经过对“唯技击论”的规训,由现代性知识与武术系统构成的权利关系网,历史性地构建起一种思想谱系,这一思想的核心是“体育性的武术”话语;体育武术思想只能产生于特定的世界观和话语组织起来的历史阶段,人们理解这些历史阶段只能依据特定的“规范性判断”和话语构成,这些是不能跨越不同“认知型”而存在的.
近代以來,在歷經“土洋之爭”及其“武術性質大討論”後,形成瞭體育武術思想.文章以譜繫學方法,打破原本已經約定俗成的武術史敘事文本,重新建構體育武術思想,探索新方法解讀武術理論的學術魅力.研究認為:武術作為一種展示身體的文化,體育武術思想深刻記錄瞭譜繫學所關註的權力與知識關繫的印跡;體育武術思想是髮耑于“土洋武術之爭”,在“體育化”話語的控釋下,經過對“唯技擊論”的規訓,由現代性知識與武術繫統構成的權利關繫網,歷史性地構建起一種思想譜繫,這一思想的覈心是“體育性的武術”話語;體育武術思想隻能產生于特定的世界觀和話語組織起來的歷史階段,人們理解這些歷史階段隻能依據特定的“規範性判斷”和話語構成,這些是不能跨越不同“認知型”而存在的.
근대이래,재력경“토양지쟁”급기“무술성질대토론”후,형성료체육무술사상.문장이보계학방법,타파원본이경약정속성적무술사서사문본,중신건구체육무술사상,탐색신방법해독무술이론적학술매력.연구인위:무술작위일충전시신체적문화,체육무술사상심각기록료보계학소관주적권력여지식관계적인적;체육무술사상시발단우“토양무술지쟁”,재“체육화”화어적공석하,경과대“유기격론”적규훈,유현대성지식여무술계통구성적권리관계망,역사성지구건기일충사상보계,저일사상적핵심시“체육성적무술”화어;체육무술사상지능산생우특정적세계관화화어조직기래적역사계단,인문리해저사역사계단지능의거특정적“규범성판단”화화어구성,저사시불능과월불동“인지형”이존재적.
The sports martial arts thought is formed after the Sino - West conflict on sport culture and the discussion about the nature of martial arts. This paper tries to use the method of genealogy to break the conventional and narrative pattern of writing the history of martial arts, to reconstruct the thought of sports martial arts and to explore a new inter- pretation method of martial arts theory. This study indicates that martial arts is a culture to demonstrate body and sports martial arts thought has recorded the trace of the relationship between power and the knowledge profoundly. Sports mar- tial arts thought started from Sino -west conflict on sport culture and it was restricted by the discourse of sportization. Through disciplining the Kong- Fu fighting theory, it was formed as a powerful relationship net with the modern knowl- edge and martial arts system and then it established a knowledge genealogy historically. The core of this thought is the sportization of martial arts. Sports martial arts thought can only come from the historical stage with specific world view and discourse and be understood by specific normative judgment and discourse, which can not exist by crossing different episteme.