中国社会科学院研究生院学报
中國社會科學院研究生院學報
중국사회과학원연구생원학보
Academic Journal Graduate School Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
2014年
3期
69~73
,共null页
专利权滥用 抗辩原则 加拿大专利法 加拿大竞争法 中国专利法第四次修改
專利權濫用 抗辯原則 加拿大專利法 加拿大競爭法 中國專利法第四次脩改
전리권람용 항변원칙 가나대전리법 가나대경쟁법 중국전리법제사차수개
patent misuse; defence to infringement; Canadian Patent Act; Canadian Competition Act; the 4th Amendment of Chinese Patent Law
在“奥贝泰克”案中，加拿大联邦上诉法院认为被上诉人赛诺菲一安万特公司的行为并未指向涉诉专利，不满足专利权滥用的构成要件，驳回上诉人奥贝泰克公司的适用专利权滥用抗辩请求。加拿大以判例法发展出较为成熟合理的“专利权滥用抗辩原则”，并与《竞争法》一起规制专利权滥用行为，确保权利人和社会公众的利益衡平。加拿大的务实立场和审慎态度对我国规制专利权滥用的立法、司法和企业“走出去”有启示并应予以借鉴。
在“奧貝泰剋”案中，加拿大聯邦上訴法院認為被上訴人賽諾菲一安萬特公司的行為併未指嚮涉訴專利，不滿足專利權濫用的構成要件，駁迴上訴人奧貝泰剋公司的適用專利權濫用抗辯請求。加拿大以判例法髮展齣較為成熟閤理的“專利權濫用抗辯原則”，併與《競爭法》一起規製專利權濫用行為，確保權利人和社會公衆的利益衡平。加拿大的務實立場和審慎態度對我國規製專利權濫用的立法、司法和企業“走齣去”有啟示併應予以藉鑒。
재“오패태극”안중，가나대련방상소법원인위피상소인새낙비일안만특공사적행위병미지향섭소전리，불만족전리권람용적구성요건，박회상소인오패태극공사적괄용전리권람용항변청구。가나대이판례법발전출교위성숙합리적“전리권람용항변원칙”，병여《경쟁법》일기규제전리권람용행위，학보권리인화사회공음적이익형평。가나대적무실립장화심신태도대아국규제전리권람용적입법、사법화기업“주출거”유계시병응여이차감。
In Apotex Inc. v. Sanofi-Aventis Canada Inc. ＆ Schering Co. , the Canadian Fed- eral Court of Appeal denied the request of defence of patent misuse referred by one of the respondents, namely Sanofi-Aventis Canada Inc.. The Court held that the respondent＇s conduct was not related to the patent at issue and could not satisfy the requirements of defence to patent misuse. The defence to patent misuse has been developed well in Canadian case law for several decades, and it is working together with Canadian Competition Act to prevent patent abuse for the purpose of balancing the public interests and private parties concerned. The Canadian experience is worth learning for Chinese legislators, judges and has great implications for Chinese enterprises that are striking to expand to overseas markets.
