CAJ | 학술논문

伊丽莎白·爱森斯坦与其媒介社会史巨著《作为变革动因的印刷机——早期近代欧洲的传播与文化变革》在因果关系的各个方面都难以自圆其说。她宣称印刷机是变革动因，但实际上却论证了它是变革诱因；她在多变量解释与单变量解释的两难境地中不能自拔；她甚至使用了因果倒置的假设与推理。然而这些都无损《印刷机》一书的理论价值。整体性思维以及对研究问题的重新陈述使该书充满了学术的想象力。
이려사백·애삼사탄여기매개사회사거저《작위변혁동인적인쇄궤——조기근대구주적전파여문화변혁》재인과관계적각개방면도난이자원기설。저선칭인쇄궤시변혁동인，단실제상각론증료타시변혁유인；저재다변량해석여단변량해석적량난경지중불능자발；저심지사용료인과도치적가설여추리。연이저사도무손《인쇄궤》일서적이론개치。정체성사유이급대연구문제적중신진술사해서충만료학술적상상력。
Elizabeth Eisensten and her social media historical masterpiece ＂The Printing Press as an Agent of Change： Communications and Cultural Transformations in Early-Modern Europe＂ are difficult to justify her own arguments at all aspects. She claimed that the printing press is an agent of change but it is proved to be innovation incentives in her analyze. She was frozen in the dilemma of univariate and multivariate interpretation, beyond that, she even used the causality-inversed assumptions and reasoning. However, these drawbacks didn＇t harm the theoretical value of the book ＂Printing Press＂. The comprehensive thinking and restatement of the study made the book full of scientific imagination.