CAJ | 학술논문

1868年的扬州教案，在晚清众多教案中具有典型的代表性，它反映了弛禁初期晚清各阶层对外来教会的态度。扬州教案并不是中方官员所说的民众对英国传教士的误扰，而是扬州官绅“以民制夷”思想在行动上的体现。但惩凶和赔款的最终结局，宣告了扬州绅民驱赶外国传教士行动的失败。类似于扬州教案的反洋教行为在此后的反教运动中屡见不鲜。
1868년적양주교안，재만청음다교안중구유전형적대표성，타반영료이금초기만청각계층대외래교회적태도。양주교안병불시중방관원소설적민음대영국전교사적오우，이시양주관신“이민제이”사상재행동상적체현。단징흉화배관적최종결국，선고료양주신민구간외국전교사행동적실패。유사우양주교안적반양교행위재차후적반교운동중루견불선。
The 1868 case in Yangzhou, is a typical representative in the late Qing Dynasty in many cases, reflects the all sectors or groups attitude towards foreign church. Yangzhou case is not the Chinese officials said the error interrupt towards British missionary,but officials ＂against foreign Rely on people＂thought was in action. But the final result of punishing evil and reparations declared the failures of Yangzhou people against foreign missionaries. Anti-foreign religion behavior similar to the Yangzhou case was often seen in the later anti-Christian movements.