CAJ | 학술논문

认为专利的授予会限制人们利用创新成果的自由，把哪些创新成果从专利授予的对象中排除出去，留给公众自由使用，关系到创新驱动发展战略能否有效实施；运用文献分析法和案例分析法，梳理美国基础工具理论的演进、价值取向和适用；进而指出中国既应坚持基础工具不得授予专利的大原则，又不把特定领域的创新事先确定为基础工具，从而避免片面追求专利的数量，淡化专利在评价创新成果水平高低中的地位，强调立法机关和司法机关应当做到加强顶层设计和“摸着石头过河”并重。
인위전리적수여회한제인문이용창신성과적자유，파나사창신성과종전리수여적대상중배제출거，류급공음자유사용，관계도창신구동발전전략능부유효실시；운용문헌분석법화안례분석법，소리미국기출공구이론적연진、개치취향화괄용；진이지출중국기응견지기출공구불득수여전리적대원칙，우불파특정영역적창신사선학정위기출공구，종이피면편면추구전리적수량，담화전리재평개창신성과수평고저중적지위，강조입법궤관화사법궤관응당주도가강정층설계화“모착석두과하”병중。
Because patent rights will limit people＇s freedom to utilize invention, it is a big deal to preserve what kind of invention for people＇s use. Analyzing U. S. fundamental tools regime based on cases and materials, this article argues that China should take a position at which fundamental tools are not parentable. At the same time, China should refrain from delineating particular areas of technology as fundamental tools. This article also suggests that China should avoid one - sided pursuit of the number of patents and put less weight on patent in the process of evaluating the level of innovation. Both legislature and judiciary should take responsibility to tackle the question of patentability of fundamental tools.