CAJ | 학술논문

本文从体系结构、具体内容两大方面对中德现行的初中地理课程标准进行了比较，两国的课程标准在体系结构和具体内容上都存在较为明显的差异。德国课程标准对学生的知识运用能力与学习探究能力要求较我国更为明确和具体，且在课程标准的应用方面提供了较多的示例；而中国课程标准强调了情感、态度、价值观在课程标准中的地位，在对学生环境意识、情感、态度方面的要求更为明确和具体。通过对比，以期为我国地理课程标准的进一步完善提供借鉴。
본문종체계결구、구체내용량대방면대중덕현행적초중지리과정표준진행료비교，량국적과정표준재체계결구화구체내용상도존재교위명현적차이。덕국과정표준대학생적지식운용능력여학습탐구능력요구교아국경위명학화구체，차재과정표준적응용방면제공료교다적시례；이중국과정표준강조료정감、태도、개치관재과정표준중적지위，재대학생배경의식、정감、태도방면적요구경위명학화구체。통과대비，이기위아국지리과정표준적진일보완선제공차감。
The paper attempts to make a comparison of the geography curriculum standards for junior middle school certificate between Germany and China. The differences both in structure and detailed contents are analyzed, and the suggestions on the revision of Chinese Geography curriculum standard for junior middle schools are put forward. According to the comparison, German geography curriculum standards put more emphasize on ability to use geography and to research and communicate, which are not emphasized enough in Chinese geography curriculum standard. Some references are provided for further revision of geography curriculum standard for junior middle schools in China.