体育科学
體育科學
체육과학
China Sport Science
2014年
6期
3~10
,共null页
公共体育场（馆） 市场化 过度 建议
公共體育場（館） 市場化 過度 建議
공공체육장（관） 시장화 과도 건의
public sports venues; excessive ; marketization ; advices
场（馆）运营改革过度市场化主要表现在场（馆）服务价格难以体现公益性、服务项目和资源配置未能考虑公共利益、场（馆）管理机构被推向市场、创收成为主要筹资渠道等方面；造成场（馆）过度市场化的主要原因包括曲解场（馆）市场化改革价值导向、地方政府财权与事权不匹配、政府监管缺位、激励评价机制不完善、公众难以参与场（馆）运营决策和场（馆）公共服务标准尚未建立等方面；场（馆）过度市场化造成的危害主要表现在个人体育支出急剧攀升、场（馆）公共服务的公平性受损和公益性丧失殆尽等方面。提出进一步明确地方政府职责，加大本级财政对场（馆）运行投入和对基层场（馆）转移支付的力度、逐步建立场（馆）理事会，吸引公众参与场（馆）运营决策、建立场（馆）公共服务标准，明确公共体育服务内容、完善场（馆）监管机制，场（馆）公共服务价格纳入政府定价和改革场（馆）绩效评价机制等避免场（馆）运营改革过度市场化的建议。
場（館）運營改革過度市場化主要錶現在場（館）服務價格難以體現公益性、服務項目和資源配置未能攷慮公共利益、場（館）管理機構被推嚮市場、創收成為主要籌資渠道等方麵；造成場（館）過度市場化的主要原因包括麯解場（館）市場化改革價值導嚮、地方政府財權與事權不匹配、政府鑑管缺位、激勵評價機製不完善、公衆難以參與場（館）運營決策和場（館）公共服務標準尚未建立等方麵；場（館）過度市場化造成的危害主要錶現在箇人體育支齣急劇攀升、場（館）公共服務的公平性受損和公益性喪失殆儘等方麵。提齣進一步明確地方政府職責，加大本級財政對場（館）運行投入和對基層場（館）轉移支付的力度、逐步建立場（館）理事會，吸引公衆參與場（館）運營決策、建立場（館）公共服務標準，明確公共體育服務內容、完善場（館）鑑管機製，場（館）公共服務價格納入政府定價和改革場（館）績效評價機製等避免場（館）運營改革過度市場化的建議。
장（관）운영개혁과도시장화주요표현재장（관）복무개격난이체현공익성、복무항목화자원배치미능고필공공이익、장（관）관리궤구피추향시장、창수성위주요주자거도등방면；조성장（관）과도시장화적주요원인포괄곡해장（관）시장화개혁개치도향、지방정부재권여사권불필배、정부감관결위、격려평개궤제불완선、공음난이삼여장（관）운영결책화장（관）공공복무표준상미건립등방면；장（관）과도시장화조성적위해주요표현재개인체육지출급극반승、장（관）공공복무적공평성수손화공익성상실태진등방면。제출진일보명학지방정부직책，가대본급재정대장（관）운행투입화대기층장（관）전이지부적력도、축보건립장（관）리사회，흡인공음삼여장（관）운영결책、건립장（관）공공복무표준，명학공공체육복무내용、완선장（관）감관궤제，장（관）공공복무개격납입정부정개화개혁장（관）적효평개궤제등피면장（관）운영개혁과도시장화적건의。
The result showed that the excessive marketization of venues were the high service price, the service and the allocation of resources fully didn＇ t concern to the public welfare, the manage organization went to market, the market became the mainly finance mode, and so on. The main reasons which lead to the excessive marketization were the misunderstanding of the marketization reform value orientation, the local government finance rights and didn＇t match, the vacancy of the government supervision, the imperfect of the incentive mechanism, the public didn＇t have the right to make a decision and the unestablished of the public service standard. The harms of the excessive marketization were the higher expenditure on fitness, the unfair of the public sports service and the lost of the public welfare. It put forward some advices that clearing responsibilities of local government, increasing the input and the transfer payment to the local sport facility, building up the council of the venues and attracting the public to the council, establishing the public service standard to definite the types of the public sports serv- ice, perfecting the supervision mechanism and supervising the price, reforming the performance evaluation mechanism to avoid the excess marketization of the venues on the marketization op- eration and reform.
