北京社会科学
北京社會科學
북경사회과학
Social Science of Beijing
2014年
3期
12~19
,共null页
土地换保障 权益协调机制 域 法 三分法
土地換保障 權益協調機製 域 法 三分法
토지환보장 권익협조궤제 역 법 삼분법
exchanging land for social security; coordination mechanisms of rights and interests; space;law ; trichotomy
城镇化进程中“土地换保障”作为一种权益协调机制得以产生,但其自身却存在诸多制度缺陷和权益冲突。作者借助“域”和“法”的三分法对“土地换保障”权益协调机制建设进行了探索。研究发现任何强制性的“土地换保障”都是不合法和不合理的,相关权益协调机制建设应明确“公域”“私域”与“第三域”的利益边界和行动规则,从价值补偿、争议协调和路径优化三方面入手推进城乡统筹发展。
城鎮化進程中“土地換保障”作為一種權益協調機製得以產生,但其自身卻存在諸多製度缺陷和權益遲突。作者藉助“域”和“法”的三分法對“土地換保障”權益協調機製建設進行瞭探索。研究髮現任何彊製性的“土地換保障”都是不閤法和不閤理的,相關權益協調機製建設應明確“公域”“私域”與“第三域”的利益邊界和行動規則,從價值補償、爭議協調和路徑優化三方麵入手推進城鄉統籌髮展。
성진화진정중“토지환보장”작위일충권익협조궤제득이산생,단기자신각존재제다제도결함화권익충돌。작자차조“역”화“법”적삼분법대“토지환보장”권익협조궤제건설진행료탐색。연구발현임하강제성적“토지환보장”도시불합법화불합리적,상관권익협조궤제건설응명학“공역”“사역”여“제삼역”적이익변계화행동규칙,종개치보상、쟁의협조화로경우화삼방면입수추진성향통주발전。
"Exchanging Land for Social Security" grows as a coordinating mechanism of rights and interests in urbanization, but there are many flaws and conflicts in its own systems. From the prospective of "Space", the article points out that interest coordination mechanisms and should emphasize value compensation, dispute coordination and path optimization, should clarify the interests boundaries and action rules of these spaces; any mandatory "land for security" is illegal and unreasonable. The path optimization of "land for security" is discussed in order to propel urban-rural harmonious development.