中国工业经济
中國工業經濟
중국공업경제
China Industrial Economy
2014年
6期
57~69
,共null页
碳强度约束 宏观效应 结构效应 可计算一般均衡模型
碳彊度約束 宏觀效應 結構效應 可計算一般均衡模型
탄강도약속 굉관효응 결구효응 가계산일반균형모형
carbon intensity constraint; macro effect; structural effect; computable equilibrium model
本文采用动态可计算一般均衡模型模拟了碳强度约束在中国宏观层面和产业层面的影响。结果表明。近期内中国需要加快降低碳强度才能实现既定的碳强度约束目标。碳强度约束将导致化石能源产品和碳密集型产品的价格有所上升.从而对中国的经济增长和国内需求特别是投资产生一定的负面影响,并导致全社会平均工资率、资本租金率和投资收益率略有下降。绝大多数部门的国内供给和总产出也会有所下降。不过,出口减少的主要是化石能源供应和碳密集型部门.许多劳动密集型和技术密集型部门的出口则可能增加,并使出口总量有所增加。绝大多数部门的进口也会下降,但一些碳密集型部门的进口有可能上升。与此同时。能源消耗和碳排放总量会大幅度下降。其中绝大部分由火力发电发热及其供应业贡献。本文认为。一方面可以通过开征碳税等政策保证碳强度约束目标得以实现。另一方面采取一些有效措施,如加快发展清洁能源、积极推广节能技术以及鼓励各部门特别是火力发电发热及其供应业改善能效.以强化碳强度约束的节能减碳效应.同时降低其对经济的负面影响.
本文採用動態可計算一般均衡模型模擬瞭碳彊度約束在中國宏觀層麵和產業層麵的影響。結果錶明。近期內中國需要加快降低碳彊度纔能實現既定的碳彊度約束目標。碳彊度約束將導緻化石能源產品和碳密集型產品的價格有所上升.從而對中國的經濟增長和國內需求特彆是投資產生一定的負麵影響,併導緻全社會平均工資率、資本租金率和投資收益率略有下降。絕大多數部門的國內供給和總產齣也會有所下降。不過,齣口減少的主要是化石能源供應和碳密集型部門.許多勞動密集型和技術密集型部門的齣口則可能增加,併使齣口總量有所增加。絕大多數部門的進口也會下降,但一些碳密集型部門的進口有可能上升。與此同時。能源消耗和碳排放總量會大幅度下降。其中絕大部分由火力髮電髮熱及其供應業貢獻。本文認為。一方麵可以通過開徵碳稅等政策保證碳彊度約束目標得以實現。另一方麵採取一些有效措施,如加快髮展清潔能源、積極推廣節能技術以及鼓勵各部門特彆是火力髮電髮熱及其供應業改善能效.以彊化碳彊度約束的節能減碳效應.同時降低其對經濟的負麵影響.
본문채용동태가계산일반균형모형모의료탄강도약속재중국굉관층면화산업층면적영향。결과표명。근기내중국수요가쾌강저탄강도재능실현기정적탄강도약속목표。탄강도약속장도치화석능원산품화탄밀집형산품적개격유소상승.종이대중국적경제증장화국내수구특별시투자산생일정적부면영향,병도치전사회평균공자솔、자본조금솔화투자수익솔략유하강。절대다수부문적국내공급화총산출야회유소하강。불과,출구감소적주요시화석능원공응화탄밀집형부문.허다노동밀집형화기술밀집형부문적출구칙가능증가,병사출구총량유소증가。절대다수부문적진구야회하강,단일사탄밀집형부문적진구유가능상승。여차동시。능원소모화탄배방총량회대폭도하강。기중절대부분유화력발전발열급기공응업공헌。본문인위。일방면가이통과개정탄세등정책보증탄강도약속목표득이실현。령일방면채취일사유효조시,여가쾌발전청길능원、적겁추엄절능기술이급고려각부문특별시화력발전발열급기공응업개선능효.이강화탄강도약속적절능감탄효응.동시강저기대경제적부면영향.
We use a dynamic computable equilibrium model to simulate the impacts of carbon intensity constraint at the macro and sector level in China. The results indicate that China should accelerate decreasing carbon intensity in the near future to realize the planned carbon intensity constraint target. The carbon intensity constraint will significantly raise the prices of fossil fuels and carbon intensive products, thus it will cause small but negative impact on China's economic growth and domestic demand, especially the investment, and cause the social average wage rate, capital rent rate and return rate of investment to decrease. The domestic supply and total output of most of the sectors will also decrease. However, the sectors whose exports will decrease are mainly the fossil fuels and carbon intensive sectors. The exports of many labor intensive and technology intensive sectors may increase. The imports of most of the sectors will decrease but the imports of several carbon intensive sectors may increase. At the same time, there will great drops in total energy consumption and carbon emissions, most of which are contributed by the sector of fire-based power and heat production and supplying. We suggest on the one hand the government may adopt policies, such as carbon tax, to achidve the carbon intensity constraint target, on the other hand the government may take measures, such as accelerating the development of non-fossil fuels, promoting energy saving technologies and encouraging each sector especially the sector of fire-based power and heat production and supplying to improving their energy efficiency, to strengthen the energy saving and carbon mitigating effects of carbon intensity constraint and reduce its negative effect on economy.