中国工业经济
中國工業經濟
중국공업경제
China Industrial Economy
2014年
6期
147~159
,共null页
电力产业 大用户直购电 市场势力
電力產業 大用戶直購電 市場勢力
전력산업 대용호직구전 시장세력
electric power industry; large customers direct purchasing; market power
本文在构建电网公司市场势力模型的基础上,经测算得到2004-2013年(除2009年)黑龙江、吉林和辽宁三省在各年度的市场势力具体数值。通过将辽宁省电力公司市场势力的变化情况与其他两省进行比较.首次尝试利用综合对比法探究削弱辽宁省电力公司市场势力的主要原因.即辽宁省抚顺铝厂的大用户直购电试点政策。进一步测算得出.在相同时间段内辽宁省抚顺铝厂大用户试点政策引致辽宁省电力公司各年的福利变动,以此揭示直购电政策是有效的市场化手段。同时。本文显示了自2004-2013年三个省级电力公司申报核算的年度固定资产折旧率、电价交叉补贴率与三省电力公司市场势力存在相同的变化趋势.而辽宁省自2009-2013年的趋势变化程度与其他两省有较大差别。据此,将三省电力公司市场势力数值与申报的固定资产折旧率和电价交叉补贴率做计量回归.进而提出规范电网公司固定资产折旧率的核算方式以及均化交叉补贴率的设想.将市场势力“关进笼子”使其不会阻碍政策的推行.为中国电力产业市场化的改革提供理论依据。
本文在構建電網公司市場勢力模型的基礎上,經測算得到2004-2013年(除2009年)黑龍江、吉林和遼寧三省在各年度的市場勢力具體數值。通過將遼寧省電力公司市場勢力的變化情況與其他兩省進行比較.首次嘗試利用綜閤對比法探究削弱遼寧省電力公司市場勢力的主要原因.即遼寧省撫順鋁廠的大用戶直購電試點政策。進一步測算得齣.在相同時間段內遼寧省撫順鋁廠大用戶試點政策引緻遼寧省電力公司各年的福利變動,以此揭示直購電政策是有效的市場化手段。同時。本文顯示瞭自2004-2013年三箇省級電力公司申報覈算的年度固定資產摺舊率、電價交扠補貼率與三省電力公司市場勢力存在相同的變化趨勢.而遼寧省自2009-2013年的趨勢變化程度與其他兩省有較大差彆。據此,將三省電力公司市場勢力數值與申報的固定資產摺舊率和電價交扠補貼率做計量迴歸.進而提齣規範電網公司固定資產摺舊率的覈算方式以及均化交扠補貼率的設想.將市場勢力“關進籠子”使其不會阻礙政策的推行.為中國電力產業市場化的改革提供理論依據。
본문재구건전망공사시장세력모형적기출상,경측산득도2004-2013년(제2009년)흑룡강、길림화료녕삼성재각년도적시장세력구체수치。통과장요녕성전력공사시장세력적변화정황여기타량성진행비교.수차상시이용종합대비법탐구삭약요녕성전력공사시장세력적주요원인.즉요녕성무순려엄적대용호직구전시점정책。진일보측산득출.재상동시간단내요녕성무순려엄대용호시점정책인치요녕성전력공사각년적복리변동,이차게시직구전정책시유효적시장화수단。동시。본문현시료자2004-2013년삼개성급전력공사신보핵산적년도고정자산절구솔、전개교차보첩솔여삼성전력공사시장세력존재상동적변화추세.이요녕성자2009-2013년적추세변화정도여기타량성유교대차별。거차,장삼성전력공사시장세력수치여신보적고정자산절구솔화전개교차보첩솔주계량회귀.진이제출규범전망공사고정자산절구솔적핵산방식이급균화교차보첩솔적설상.장시장세력“관진롱자”사기불회조애정책적추행.위중국전력산업시장화적개혁제공이론의거。
This paper constructs the model of market power of State Grid Corporation of China. Then, the paper estimates, from 2004 to 2013 (except 2009), numerical market power by using of Heilongjiang, Jilin and Liaoning provincial company related data. On the basis of numerical market power, the paper makes a deep comparison of the change of market power between Liaoning province and other provinces, and utilize the method of comprehensive analysis which focus on the effect of Liaoning Fushun Aluminum Plant large customers direct power purchasing policy to Liaoning province electric power company. The result presents significantly weaken effect of market power, subsequently, the paper estimates the welfare caused by the change in each year,which points out the policy can be marketization. In the process of calculation and analysis above, the paper found that, since 2004-2013, three provincial electric power companies declare the annum depreciation rate of fixed assets, electricity cross subsidy rate and the two provincial electric power company market power present the same change trend. But the trend of Liaoning province, from 2009-2013, has a great difference with other provinces of degree. Based on this, combined with the above figures provincial electric power company numerical market power, the paper does a regression of market power, fixed assets depreciation rate and electricity price cross subsidy rate. Then, the paper points out the thought of standardize the grid company depreciation rate of fixed assets accounting, and the idea of homogenization cross subsidy rate. Making the market power "in the cage" will not hinder the implementation of the policy, which will be positive for the reform of marketization of power industry in China.