CAJ | 학술논문

通过控制SOA形成两种任务相继呈现的不同情境,考察社会启动范式下不同思维方式对双任务成绩的影响.发现：在任务1上,发散思维启动条件下反应兼容效应大于聚合思维启动条件,且两者均大于无思维启动条件.说明：被试的聚合思维和发散思维被成功启动,激活了不同的思维认知通道,从而影响了随后的任务1的成绩;在任务2上,发散思维启动条件和聚合思维启动条件均出现心理不应期效应,且发散思维比聚合思维的效应小.这些结果支持了社会启动下思维认知的双通道模型.
통과공제SOA형성량충임무상계정현적불동정경,고찰사회계동범식하불동사유방식대쌍임무성적적영향.발현：재임무1상,발산사유계동조건하반응겸용효응대우취합사유계동조건,차량자균대우무사유계동조건.설명：피시적취합사유화발산사유피성공계동,격활료불동적사유인지통도,종이영향료수후적임무1적성적;재임무2상,발산사유계동조건화취합사유계동조건균출현심리불응기효응,차발산사유비취합사유적효응소.저사결과지지료사회계동하사유인지적쌍통도모형.
The present study primarily investigated whether different modes of thinking could influence the performance of a dual task in a social priming paradigm by controlling the SOA between Task 1 and Task 2. The analysis of response time in Task 1 shows a larger compatibility effect of divergent thinking than that of convergent thinking condition with both of them larger than the neutral condition. It suggests that the different modes of thinking have been successfully primed, thus activate different cognitive control status, and have an impact on the performance of subsequent Task 1. The analysis of response time in Task 2 shows that the PRP effect occurs in both divergent-thinking priming condition and convergent-thinking priming condition with a more salient effect in convergent-thinking priming condition. Our results provide evidence to support the dual-pathway model of creativity.