南京农业大学学报:社会科学版
南京農業大學學報:社會科學版
남경농업대학학보:사회과학판
Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science Edition)
2014年
1期
28~42
,共null页
项目 国家动员 地方实践 意外后果
項目 國傢動員 地方實踐 意外後果
항목 국가동원 지방실천 의외후과
Capital Allocation to Countryside;Land Circulation;Use of Resources;Gray Violence;Formal Authority
经验呈现出村庄治理性条件与基础性条件是影响项目绩效的关键.本文尝试提出二对分析概念即“公共治理”和“私人治理”、“利诱型基础”和“排斥型基础”试图对项目问题做深入分析.建立通过对个案方法及其比较研究基础上的研究,可以明晰项目地方实践的不同表达及其成因的复杂性.项目绩效的发挥不仅需要村民的参与,而且也需要以公共性为目的的村庄治理;同时,社会基础条件和治理样态也会相互影响.拥有良好组织能力的“利诱型基础”的社区条件和“公权公用”的治理性基础是项目效度的关键,而“排斥型基础”的社区条件以及“公权公用”的“私人治理”就成为项目限度的根源.
經驗呈現齣村莊治理性條件與基礎性條件是影響項目績效的關鍵.本文嘗試提齣二對分析概唸即“公共治理”和“私人治理”、“利誘型基礎”和“排斥型基礎”試圖對項目問題做深入分析.建立通過對箇案方法及其比較研究基礎上的研究,可以明晰項目地方實踐的不同錶達及其成因的複雜性.項目績效的髮揮不僅需要村民的參與,而且也需要以公共性為目的的村莊治理;同時,社會基礎條件和治理樣態也會相互影響.擁有良好組織能力的“利誘型基礎”的社區條件和“公權公用”的治理性基礎是項目效度的關鍵,而“排斥型基礎”的社區條件以及“公權公用”的“私人治理”就成為項目限度的根源.
경험정현출촌장치이성조건여기출성조건시영향항목적효적관건.본문상시제출이대분석개념즉“공공치리”화“사인치리”、“리유형기출”화“배척형기출”시도대항목문제주심입분석.건립통과대개안방법급기비교연구기출상적연구,가이명석항목지방실천적불동표체급기성인적복잡성.항목적효적발휘불부수요촌민적삼여,이차야수요이공공성위목적적촌장치리;동시,사회기출조건화치리양태야회상호영향.옹유량호조직능력적“리유형기출”적사구조건화“공권공용”적치이성기출시항목효도적관건,이“배척형기출”적사구조건이급“공권공용”적“사인치리”취성위항목한도적근원.
The capital to promote large-scale land circulation emerged in the rural social transformation. Under thecomplex power structure of rural society,the capital had to be realized with the help of the strategic behavior--to take advantage of the rural informal authority,namely,“the village bully”,so as to obtain the protection andsupport--and achieved the “legitimate”land circulation smoothly with the help of the village-level organiza-tions,and with the use of the state discourse under the standardized procedures. In the actual land circulation,thevillage-level organization played a role of “agent”to turn the capital hidden in the background into the acquisi-tion of land through making use of the village cadres full of a social trust and the authority to complete the landcirculation task,and to manage the farmer worker and rental issuance. The negative consequence of such a prac-tice was that farmers are passive in this inequality Game field,and their legitimate rights and interests were se-verely infringed. Meanwhile,such a role of “agent”increased the political risks of the village-level organizationsand gradually undermined the legitimacy and the authority of village-level organizations.