CAJ | 학술논문

在当前受贿罪的司法认定中,我们一般都只关注到受贿人在“收受贿赂”这一侧面所表现的行为定性和定量问题,而对其在权钱交易的另一侧面,即作为贿赂标的物存在的“渎职弄权”行为却研究甚少.这种侵害公权力行为严重性程度的量化不足将使得我们只能得到行为是否构成受贿罪的定性结论,却无法根据不同的侵害公权力行为严重性程度在量刑上做出有效区分.通过对侵害公权力行为严重性程度量化的可能性、量化标准、立法与司法应用的探讨,以期能有效地解决这一问题.
재당전수회죄적사법인정중,아문일반도지관주도수회인재“수수회뢰”저일측면소표현적행위정성화정량문제,이대기재권전교역적령일측면,즉작위회뢰표적물존재적“독직롱권”행위각연구심소.저충침해공권역행위엄중성정도적양화불족장사득아문지능득도행위시부구성수회죄적정성결론,각무법근거불동적침해공권역행위엄중성정도재양형상주출유효구분.통과대침해공권역행위엄중성정도양화적가능성、양화표준、입법여사법응용적탐토,이기능유효지해결저일문제.
In current judicial cognizance of bribery crime, we tend to focus on the behavior of “taking bribery” and thecharacter and quantity of the conduct. But little research has been done into the behavior of “prejudicial act of the publicpower behavior in bribery crime”. Lack of quantitative to the severity of the behavior of “prejudicial act of the publicpower behavior in bribery crime”will not prevent us from getting the qualitative conclusions of whether such briberiesare crimes, but it can’t continue to provide us standard for measurement of penalty. By exploring the quantitativeprobabilities of the severity of it, we look for the “seed” of quantifing the characteristics of violations of the publicpower behaviors. Finally, through distincting four types of violations of the public power behaviors and the legalstandard of “legalization”, we try to complete the quantitative research on prejudicial act of the public power behaviorin bribery crime.