CAJ | 학술논문

目前国内外社区参与研究存在从无到有的显性化研究的共性．但也存在内容、模式、方法等方面的差异。差异产生的根源可以从方法论和本体论层面给予解释。方法论层面而言，这涉及学术研究的主体性问题，本体论层面而言，这涉及文化自觉的问题。通过比较社区参与的“来龙”的研究，基于反思的角度，认为中国目前社区参与研究仍然将社区作为一种客体的研究对象来看待，而并未将其视为研究主体。因此，中国社区参与的“去脉”研究理应是将社区从一种“研究的客体”向“研究的主体”转变。这样，不仅有助于社会参与理论的完善和中国本土模式的建构，而且有助于对中国学术进行主体性内省。
목전국내외사구삼여연구존재종무도유적현성화연구적공성．단야존재내용、모식、방법등방면적차이。차이산생적근원가이종방법론화본체론층면급여해석。방법론층면이언，저섭급학술연구적주체성문제，본체론층면이언，저섭급문화자각적문제。통과비교사구삼여적“래룡”적연구，기우반사적각도，인위중국목전사구삼여연구잉연장사구작위일충객체적연구대상래간대，이병미장기시위연구주체。인차，중국사구삼여적“거맥”연구리응시장사구종일충“연구적객체”향“연구적주체”전변。저양，불부유조우사회삼여이론적완선화중국본토모식적건구，이차유조우대중국학술진행주체성내성。
Similarities in domination research could be seen in community participatory research while differences are as well obvious in content, modes, and methodologies. The differences originate mainly from methodology and ontology. In the case of methodology, the academic issue of subjectivity is involved while the cultural spontaneity is considered when it is discussed from the perspective of ＂reflection＂. Through a comparative study on origins of community participatory research, it is found that community participatory research is currently considering community the object of the research rather than the subject of the research. Therefore, the predictive research should focus on the transformation of community from ＂ the objective＂ to ＂ the subjective of the research＂, which would help not only to perfect the community participatory theory and to establish a pattern with distinct Chinese feature, but alo to prompt Chinese academe to proceed with subjective introspection.