CAJ | 학술논문

本文使用来自中国4个省8个县64个村庄900多个农村居民的调查数据研究了中国农村居民的比较强度、比较方向以及比较中的包容性对主观幸福感的影响。大约45％的农村被调查者在日常生活中会与别人进行比较。收入低的农村居民的比较强度高，比较强度对幸福感没有显著影响。进行比较的农村居民把“本村民小组居民”作为比较参照系的比例最高，选择“邻居”作为比较方向的农村居民幸福感最低。收入高、受教育年限长或女性农村居民的包容性强，包容性强的农村居民幸福感高。
본문사용래자중국4개성8개현64개촌장900다개농촌거민적조사수거연구료중국농촌거민적비교강도、비교방향이급비교중적포용성대주관행복감적영향。대약45％적농촌피조사자재일상생활중회여별인진행비교。수입저적농촌거민적비교강도고，비교강도대행복감몰유현저영향。진행비교적농촌거민파“본촌민소조거민”작위비교삼조계적비례최고，선택“린거”작위비교방향적농촌거민행복감최저。수입고、수교육년한장혹녀성농촌거민적포용성강，포용성강적농촌거민행복감고。
This paper aims to seek the relationship between comparative intensity, comparative directions,inclusion in social comparison and subjective well - being by using the survey of more than 900 rural residents from 64 administrative villages in 8 counties, and 4 provinces in China. About 45 % investigated rural residents compare with others in daily life. The lower income the rural residents have, the higher the intensity of comparison is. Meanwhile, the intensity of comparison has no significant impact on subjective well - being. With respect to the directions of comparison, villagers in the same sub - village are the most frequently cited as the reference group. Those who compare to neighborhoods are unhappier than those who compare to other benchmarks. Females or those who have higher income or higher education have stronger inclusion. The rural residents who have higher inclusion are much happier.