中国人口资源与环境
中國人口資源與環境
중국인구자원여배경
China Polulation.Resources and Environment
2014年
7期
140~148
,共null页
周杨 张军连 李林 韩岳岐 李文娟
週楊 張軍連 李林 韓嶽岐 李文娟
주양 장군련 리림 한악기 리문연
产业用地 微观尺度 宗地 区位线 集约利用评价 合肥市
產業用地 微觀呎度 宗地 區位線 集約利用評價 閤肥市
산업용지 미관척도 종지 구위선 집약이용평개 합비시
industrial Land ; micro - scale ; parcel of land ; location line ; evaluation of intensive use ; Hefei City
在我国城市产业用地利用过程中存在着较多的土地闲置、浪费和低效利用等现象。实施产业用地的集约利用评价研究可以为城市产业用地优化配置和管理提供科学依据,对城市用地的节约集约利用有着重要意义。本文从城市土地空间布局和利用强度角度出发。以同心圆理论、多中心理论等区位理论为支撑。采用定性和定量化方法结合。以科学、便捷、商效为原则.系统地提出宗地层次上的产业用地集约利用评价指标体系、标准以及评价模型,并对合肥市商服业用地、重工业用地和轻工业用地的集约利用情况进行了评价.适当提出了一些用地建议。评价结果表明:①在所有评价的宗地中.有62.46%的宗地达到集约.总体集约水平较低;②在兰类用地中.达到集约的宗地数量比例从高到低依次为商服业用地、重工业用地和轻工业用地,集约比例分别为66.64%.41.39%.36.02%;③合肥市4个行政区内的产业用地集约利用水平比较接近.庐阳区和包河区相差不大.分别为67.66%和67.36%,蜀山区略低。为62.08%。瑶海区最低。为53.77%:④不同区位圈层内的产业用地集约利用情况存在差异。从内圈屡到外圈屡。集约的商服业用地数量比例呈现先下降后上升的状态,重工业用地则呈现上升的趋势,而轻工业用地一直处于比较低的利用状态,只有35%稍多。综上所述。建议适当降低市区内商服业用地的建筑密度,提高市区外围的商服业用地容积率和建筑密度;继续推进“退二进三”政策.优化城市产业用地布局,并提高轻重工业用地的利用强度;加强土地监管,防止圈地,闲置.随意改变土地用途等现象。
在我國城市產業用地利用過程中存在著較多的土地閒置、浪費和低效利用等現象。實施產業用地的集約利用評價研究可以為城市產業用地優化配置和管理提供科學依據,對城市用地的節約集約利用有著重要意義。本文從城市土地空間佈跼和利用彊度角度齣髮。以同心圓理論、多中心理論等區位理論為支撐。採用定性和定量化方法結閤。以科學、便捷、商效為原則.繫統地提齣宗地層次上的產業用地集約利用評價指標體繫、標準以及評價模型,併對閤肥市商服業用地、重工業用地和輕工業用地的集約利用情況進行瞭評價.適噹提齣瞭一些用地建議。評價結果錶明:①在所有評價的宗地中.有62.46%的宗地達到集約.總體集約水平較低;②在蘭類用地中.達到集約的宗地數量比例從高到低依次為商服業用地、重工業用地和輕工業用地,集約比例分彆為66.64%.41.39%.36.02%;③閤肥市4箇行政區內的產業用地集約利用水平比較接近.廬暘區和包河區相差不大.分彆為67.66%和67.36%,蜀山區略低。為62.08%。瑤海區最低。為53.77%:④不同區位圈層內的產業用地集約利用情況存在差異。從內圈屢到外圈屢。集約的商服業用地數量比例呈現先下降後上升的狀態,重工業用地則呈現上升的趨勢,而輕工業用地一直處于比較低的利用狀態,隻有35%稍多。綜上所述。建議適噹降低市區內商服業用地的建築密度,提高市區外圍的商服業用地容積率和建築密度;繼續推進“退二進三”政策.優化城市產業用地佈跼,併提高輕重工業用地的利用彊度;加彊土地鑑管,防止圈地,閒置.隨意改變土地用途等現象。
재아국성시산업용지이용과정중존재착교다적토지한치、낭비화저효이용등현상。실시산업용지적집약이용평개연구가이위성시산업용지우화배치화관리제공과학의거,대성시용지적절약집약이용유착중요의의。본문종성시토지공간포국화이용강도각도출발。이동심원이론、다중심이론등구위이론위지탱。채용정성화정양화방법결합。이과학、편첩、상효위원칙.계통지제출종지층차상적산업용지집약이용평개지표체계、표준이급평개모형,병대합비시상복업용지、중공업용지화경공업용지적집약이용정황진행료평개.괄당제출료일사용지건의。평개결과표명:①재소유평개적종지중.유62.46%적종지체도집약.총체집약수평교저;②재란류용지중.체도집약적종지수량비례종고도저의차위상복업용지、중공업용지화경공업용지,집약비례분별위66.64%.41.39%.36.02%;③합비시4개행정구내적산업용지집약이용수평비교접근.려양구화포하구상차불대.분별위67.66%화67.36%,촉산구략저。위62.08%。요해구최저。위53.77%:④불동구위권층내적산업용지집약이용정황존재차이。종내권루도외권루。집약적상복업용지수량비례정현선하강후상승적상태,중공업용지칙정현상승적추세,이경공업용지일직처우비교저적이용상태,지유35%초다。종상소술。건의괄당강저시구내상복업용지적건축밀도,제고시구외위적상복업용지용적솔화건축밀도;계속추진“퇴이진삼”정책.우화성시산업용지포국,병제고경중공업용지적이용강도;가강토지감관,방지권지,한치.수의개변토지용도등현상。
The phenomena of unreasonable, wasteful and inefficient use of land widely exist in urban land use in China. The study of intensive use of land provides a scientific basis for optimizing the distribution and management of urban industrial land, and plays a significant role in promoting the economical and intensive land - use policies. The paper, systematically puts forward the indicator system, standards and evaluation models for the intensive use of industrial land at the level of parcels and evaluates the situation of intensive use of business land, heavy industrial land and light industrial land in Hefei City, based on the concentric zone theory, the location theory and the multi - center theory, taking the concepts of intensive use of land and industrial land from the spatial layout and utilization intensity of urban land, and through jointly adopting qualitative and quantitative methods and adhering to the principals of science, convenience and high efficiency and the conclusion is as follows : ( 1 ) the condition of the intensive use of land is generally at a lower level with the percentage of 62.46% among all the parcels evaluated;(2)among the three types of use of land, the percentage of the intensive use of land ranks in a descending order, namely, business land 66.64%, heavy industry 41.39% and light industry 36.02% ; (3) the levels of the intensive use of industrial land are approximately the same in the four districts. Luyang District and Baohe District differ little with the percentages of 67.66% and 67.36%, and Shushan District is slightly lower with the percentage of 62.08, and Yaohai District is the lowest with the percentage of 53.77% ; (4) the conditions of intensive use of industrial land vary in different location circles, and the percentage of business land decreases and increases from the inner circle to the outer circle and the percentage of heavy industry land maintains the trend of increasing, while the percentage of light industry land lingers at a low utilization level with the proportion of lightly over 35%. In conclusion, it is advised that the density of buildings in the urban area should be adequately lowered and the plot ratio and density of building should be increased in the suburbs; the policy of "decreasing the heavy industry and increasing the service industry" should be continued, the layout of industrial land be optimized and the utilization intensity of light industry be enhanced ; the supervision over land use should be strengthened and land enclosures and unused land be avoided.