山东体育学院学报
山東體育學院學報
산동체육학원학보
Journal of Shandong Institute Of Physical Education And Sports
2014年
3期
57~60
,共null页
陈岩 孙威 杨帆 葛新发
陳巖 孫威 楊帆 葛新髮
진암 손위 양범 갈신발
老年人 跌倒史 足底压力 正常行走 跨越障碍
老年人 跌倒史 足底壓力 正常行走 跨越障礙
노년인 질도사 족저압력 정상행주 과월장애
elderly people ; fall histories ; plantar pressure ; walk normally ; step over barriers
目的:研究有跌倒史老年人在不同行走状态下足底压力特征。方法:采用比利时Rss—can足底压力测试系统测试有跌倒史老年人(跌倒组10名)和无跌倒史老年(对照组10名)在正常行走和跨越障碍时足底压力特征参数。结果:正常行走时,跌倒组左右足两个波峰值均小于对照组,且具有显著性差异(P〈0.05),跌倒组右足在第2—5趾骨、第1跖骨、第4跖骨和第5跖骨压力峰值显著大于左足(P〈0.05),对照组只有在第1跖骨和足中部压力峰值差异具有显著性(P〈0.05),跌倒组右足压力中心轨迹在x轴移动范围显著小于左足(P〈0.05);跨越障碍时,两组左足(支撑足)波峰值都会下降,其中对照组左足波峰值下降显著(P〈O.05),但大于跌倒组(19〉0.05),两组左足(支撑足)在第1趾骨和足中部压力峰值有显著性差异(P〈0.05),跌倒组右足压力中心轨迹在x轴移动范围显著大于正常行走(P〈0.05),也显著大于对照组(P〈0.05),而在Y轴移动范围显著小于正常行走(P〈0.05)。由此发现有跌倒史老年人左右足底受压不对称和压力中心轨迹不一致,在跨越障碍时足地接触时间延长和足侧向摆动增大,导致跌倒风险增加。
目的:研究有跌倒史老年人在不同行走狀態下足底壓力特徵。方法:採用比利時Rss—can足底壓力測試繫統測試有跌倒史老年人(跌倒組10名)和無跌倒史老年(對照組10名)在正常行走和跨越障礙時足底壓力特徵參數。結果:正常行走時,跌倒組左右足兩箇波峰值均小于對照組,且具有顯著性差異(P〈0.05),跌倒組右足在第2—5趾骨、第1蹠骨、第4蹠骨和第5蹠骨壓力峰值顯著大于左足(P〈0.05),對照組隻有在第1蹠骨和足中部壓力峰值差異具有顯著性(P〈0.05),跌倒組右足壓力中心軌跡在x軸移動範圍顯著小于左足(P〈0.05);跨越障礙時,兩組左足(支撐足)波峰值都會下降,其中對照組左足波峰值下降顯著(P〈O.05),但大于跌倒組(19〉0.05),兩組左足(支撐足)在第1趾骨和足中部壓力峰值有顯著性差異(P〈0.05),跌倒組右足壓力中心軌跡在x軸移動範圍顯著大于正常行走(P〈0.05),也顯著大于對照組(P〈0.05),而在Y軸移動範圍顯著小于正常行走(P〈0.05)。由此髮現有跌倒史老年人左右足底受壓不對稱和壓力中心軌跡不一緻,在跨越障礙時足地接觸時間延長和足側嚮襬動增大,導緻跌倒風險增加。
목적:연구유질도사노년인재불동행주상태하족저압력특정。방법:채용비리시Rss—can족저압력측시계통측시유질도사노년인(질도조10명)화무질도사노년(대조조10명)재정상행주화과월장애시족저압력특정삼수。결과:정상행주시,질도조좌우족량개파봉치균소우대조조,차구유현저성차이(P〈0.05),질도조우족재제2—5지골、제1척골、제4척골화제5척골압력봉치현저대우좌족(P〈0.05),대조조지유재제1척골화족중부압력봉치차이구유현저성(P〈0.05),질도조우족압력중심궤적재x축이동범위현저소우좌족(P〈0.05);과월장애시,량조좌족(지탱족)파봉치도회하강,기중대조조좌족파봉치하강현저(P〈O.05),단대우질도조(19〉0.05),량조좌족(지탱족)재제1지골화족중부압력봉치유현저성차이(P〈0.05),질도조우족압력중심궤적재x축이동범위현저대우정상행주(P〈0.05),야현저대우대조조(P〈0.05),이재Y축이동범위현저소우정상행주(P〈0.05)。유차발현유질도사노년인좌우족저수압불대칭화압력중심궤적불일치,재과월장애시족지접촉시간연장화족측향파동증대,도치질도풍험증가。
Objective : To study the plantar pressure characteristics of elderly people with fall histories. Methods:The Rsscan plantar pressure test system (Belgium)was used to test elderly people with or without fall histories in different walking conditions. They were divided into two groups(fall group 10people and control group 10 people). Results:When they walked normally, the wave crest values ofelderly people with fall group were significantly lower than the control group ( P 〈 0. 05 ) group, the left foot crest values were significantly greater than the right foot in Toe 2 -5, In fall Metal, Meta4 and Meta5 ( P 〈 0.05 ), but in control group, the significant differences only showed in Metal and Mid Foot ( P 〈 0.05 ). In fall group, the right foot pressure center moving range on X axis wassignificantly smaller than the left foot( P 〈 0.05 ). When they stepped over barriers, the left foot wave crest values were all decreased, but the decrease is greater in control group ( P 〈 0.05 ). The left foot crest values had significant differences in Toel and Mid Foot( P 〈 0.05 )in both groups. In fall group, the right foot pressure center moving range on X axis was significantly greater than walking normally and that than control group (P 〈 0.05 ). In fall group the right foot pressure center moving range on Y axis was significantly less than walking normally ( P 〈0. 05 ). Above all, elderly people with fall histories showed the characteristic of asymmetric plantar pressure and inconsistent pressure center track. When they step over barriers, the foot and ground contact time is longer and the foot lateralswing is bigger,which result in greater fall risks.