CAJ | 학술논문

传统的组织承诺研究认为主体同质，且服从某种固有的概率分布，样本分析所得结论可以直接应用于总体。然而，越来越多的研究显示样本具有异质性以及非等价性，因此样本研究结果不能作为总体的无偏估计。本文通过对国外组织承诺前沿研究的梳理，从异质性和非等价性研究视角，以组织承诺焦点为分类标准，系统分析了异质性和非等价性视角下的单组织承诺、双组织承诺和多组织承诺相关研究成果，并结合国内组织承诺研究现状，指出了未来的主要研究方向。
전통적조직승낙연구인위주체동질，차복종모충고유적개솔분포，양본분석소득결론가이직접응용우총체。연이，월래월다적연구현시양본구유이질성이급비등개성，인차양본연구결과불능작위총체적무편고계。본문통과대국외조직승낙전연연구적소리，종이질성화비등개성연구시각，이조직승낙초점위분류표준，계통분석료이질성화비등개성시각하적단조직승낙、쌍조직승낙화다조직승낙상관연구성과，병결합국내조직승낙연구현상，지출료미래적주요연구방향。
Traditional studies of organizational commitment consider that subjects are homogeneous, obeying an inherent probability distribution, and the conclusions from sample analysis could be directly applied to the overall. However,a growing number of studies show that the sample is featured by heterogeneity and non-equivalence, so sample study cannot be used as an unbiased estimate of the overall. Through a review of foreign frontier research of organizational commitment, this paper takes organizational commitment focuses as a classification criterion and systematically analyzes research achievements concerning single, double and multiple organizational commitments from the perspectives of heterogeneity and non-equivalence. Meanwhile, it points out the directions in future research based on domestic status of organizational commitment research.