CAJ | 학술논문

附随义务的法律适用标准问题，是司法审判实践中较为突出的难点问题。由于在合同履行和法律层面上缺少完整认识，因此适用规则的认定标准不一而产生的裁判纷争并未消除。附随义务的适用应在其他合同义务履行之后，其兜底补充作用可弥补任意性规范约定的瑕疵，违反附随义务的责任构成要件与违反合同约定义务相较具有特殊性，因此可认定为承担特殊的违约责任，而适用何种归责原则，则要以法律对此义务所要求的严格程度以及对各方面利益保护的公正均衡为考量。
부수의무적법률괄용표준문제，시사법심판실천중교위돌출적난점문제。유우재합동리행화법률층면상결소완정인식，인차괄용규칙적인정표준불일이산생적재판분쟁병미소제。부수의무적괄용응재기타합동의무리행지후，기두저보충작용가미보임의성규범약정적하자，위반부수의무적책임구성요건여위반합동약정의무상교구유특수성，인차가인정위승담특수적위약책임，이괄용하충귀책원칙，칙요이법률대차의무소요구적엄격정도이급대각방면이익보호적공정균형위고량。
The problem of collateral obligation with the legal standards applicable, is a prominent and difficult problem in judicial practice. Due to the lack of complete understanding of the contract and the legal level, the dispute of unified standard rules is not eliminating. Collateral obligation should be applied after the performance of other contracts, and its supplementary effect can make up for the defects of arbitrary norms agreed. The constitute of violating collateral obligation has its particularity compared with violating contract obligation, so it can be identified as bearing special responsibility of contract breach, and as for applying which imputation principle, it must refer to the strictness required by law and the fair balance of the interests protection of all aspects.