CAJ | 학술논문

邓小平功利思想与西方功利主义在哲学基础、道德评价标准、人民利益原则、功利与正义之间关系的理解上存在着本质区别。前者建立在唯物史观的基础上，后者建立在唯心史观的基础上；前者强调动机与效果的统一，后者把动机与效果截然对立起来，认为效果是评判行为好坏的唯一根据；前者致力于实现最广大人民群众的根本利益，强调个人利益与集体利益的一致性，后者强调“最大多数人的最大幸福”，认为个人利益是最现实的利益，社会利益是个人利益的简单相加；前者强调功利与正义的统一，功利是正义的基础，正义是功利的保障，正义是终极目标，后者认为功利与正义截然对立，功利是终极目标，正义只是功利的副产品。
산소평공리사상여서방공리주의재철학기출、도덕평개표준、인민이익원칙、공리여정의지간관계적리해상존재착본질구별。전자건립재유물사관적기출상，후자건립재유심사관적기출상；전자강조동궤여효과적통일，후자파동궤여효과절연대립기래，인위효과시평판행위호배적유일근거；전자치력우실현최엄대인민군음적근본이익，강조개인이익여집체이익적일치성，후자강조“최대다수인적최대행복”，인위개인이익시최현실적이익，사회이익시개인이익적간단상가；전자강조공리여정의적통일，공리시정의적기출，정의시공리적보장，정의시종겁목표，후자인위공리여정의절연대립，공리시종겁목표，정의지시공리적부산품。
There are essential differences between Deng Xiaoping＇s utilitarian thought and Western utilitarianism on philosophical foundation, the moral evaluation criteria, the principle of people＇s interests and the understanding of the relationship between utility and justice. The former was founded on the basis of historical materialism, but the latter on the basis of historical idealism. The former em- phasized the unity of motive and effect, but the latter thought that the motive was completely in composition to the effect and regarded the effect as only basis of judging the behavior. The former devoted itself to meeting the basic interests of the masses and emphasized the unity of individual interests and collective interests, but the latter emphasized ＂the most happiness of the most people＂ and thought that individual interests was the most real interests and social interest was the simple plus of individual interests. The former emphasized the unity of utility and justice. Utility was the basis of justice. Justice was the safeguard of utility. Justice was the ultimate aim. But the latter thought that utility was completely in composition to justice. Utility was the ultimate aim but justice was only the by-product of utility.