CAJ | 학술논문

分别运用Stackelberg与Nash的非合作博弈理论以及合作博弈论，研究了博弈双方在分散式、集中式、部分及全面合作等5种情形下系统的低碳化水平和收益决策，并对系统均衡点进行了比较分析。研究发现：相比分散式决策情形，采取全面合作策略对系统的总收益和低碳化水平最为有利；仅仅在低碳化水平上开展合作，而在其他系统参数的选取采用分散式决策模式，对于整个系统的利润及低碳化水平提升作用非常有限，甚至不如完全Nash博弈情形下的系统绩效；由电商主导下的分散型决策情形，系统的整体绩效要明显优于3PLs主导下的系统绩效。
분별운용Stackelberg여Nash적비합작박혁이론이급합작박혁론，연구료박혁쌍방재분산식、집중식、부분급전면합작등5충정형하계통적저탄화수평화수익결책，병대계통균형점진행료비교분석。연구발현：상비분산식결책정형，채취전면합작책략대계통적총수익화저탄화수평최위유리；부부재저탄화수평상개전합작，이재기타계통삼수적선취채용분산식결책모식，대우정개계통적리윤급저탄화수평제승작용비상유한，심지불여완전Nash박혁정형하적계통적효；유전상주도하적분산형결책정형，계통적정체적효요명현우우3PLs주도하적계통적효。
Utilizing Stackelberg,-Nash＇s non-cooperative game theory and cooperative game theory, the low-carbon levels and profit decisions under five various scenarios such as decentralized, centralized decision making, partial and full cooperation are analyzed comparatively. Results show that compared to decentralized decision making scenario, the low-carbon level and total profit will reach its highest under the fully cooperation scenario ; only cooperating on low-carbon levels with decen- tralized decision-making on other ystematical parameters, improvement of profits and low-carbon levels is still much limited, even worse than pure Nash game scenario; the performance of the E-commerce enterprise-leading low-carbon service system outperforms much 3PLs-leading one.